Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frithguild
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals .... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." -- Albert Gallatin, New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789

Marshall died two years after his Barron mistake. He may have been senile by that point... It's the only thing the makes sense of his drastic turn on the BoR and the complete ignorance of the legislation used to pass the BoR.

9 posted on 07/01/2009 12:37:09 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse; ml/nj

“It’s the only thing the makes sense of his drastic turn on the BoR and the complete ignorance of the legislation used to pass the BoR.”

I’m interested in your support for this argument, as it is pretty well accepted that the bill of rights was intended to apply only to the general government, and that is echoed in the debates surrounding the adoption of the amendments. Madison pointed out during the debate, quite correctly, as it turns out, that Art. 1, s. 8 gave Congress significantly broad powers that needed to be checked. Madison stated “[i]f there is any reason for restraining the state governments from this power [through state constitutions], there is like reason for restraining the federal government.”

I just don’t think the debates back up the contention that the bill of rights was intended to apply to the states. The history just doesn’t bear it out.


12 posted on 07/01/2009 1:05:17 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson