Given the timeframes involved in evolution, you're very unlikely to see new species arise from others in 150 years.
What is the missing link for ‘man’? Proof? Source?
Missing link between humans and what?
While I don’t deny that God could set evolution in motion, I don’t ascribe the the presupposition that Darwin’s theory is anything more than a theory.
Well, seeing as it's called the theory of evolution, of course it's a theory. What do you expect it to be?
“All right. What species have evolved to another species in the last 50 years? Since Darwin? What is your proof? Source?”
“Given the timeframes involved in evolution, you’re very unlikely to see new species arise from others in 150 years.”
OK, but 2/12 mmarked the 200th anniversary of Darwin’s birth.
http://www.aboutdarwin.com/
“What is the missing link for ‘man’? Proof? Source?”
Missing link between humans and what? ‘Apes’/Homo erectus, etc.
“While I don’t deny that God could set evolution in motion, I don’t ascribe the the presupposition that Darwin’s theory is anything more than a theory.”
“Well, seeing as it’s called the theory of evolution, of course it’s a theory. What do you expect it to be?”
I have tome to expect it to be Dogma in scientific circles, absent specific and incontrovertible proof. The dismissal of those who ascribe to a Biblical worldview by academicians reminds me of the original lecture in the movie ‘Stargate’ in which the character of Daniel Jackson was met with hostility and personal attacks. Debate on point is a non-starter for evolutionists and Christians/Jews. However, that people who believe so strongly in evolution without incontrovertible proof in the face of scientific practice and strictness of proof makes the adoration of evolution more religion than science.