Posted on 07/02/2009 4:42:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Not only is this old news, but its old news Ive written about multiple times. Why cover it again? Because: It cant be stressed enough that as bad as the current nuclear standoff with Iran is, it could have been that much worse if a certain nutjob wild card was still part of the international deck.
Husseins fear of Iran, which he said he considered a greater threat than the United States, featured prominently in the discussion about weapons of mass destruction. Iran and Iraq had fought a grinding eight-year war in the 1980s, and Hussein said he was convinced that Iran was trying to annex southern Iraq which is largely Shiite. Hussein viewed the other countries in the Middle East as weak and could not defend themselves or Iraq from an attack from Iran, Piro recounted in his summary of a June 11, 2004, conversation.
The threat from Iran was the major factor as to why he did not allow the return of UN inspectors, Piro wrote. Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraqs weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq.
Hussein noted that Irans weapons capabilities had increased dramatically while Iraqs weapons had been eliminated by the UN sanctions, and that eventually Iraq would have to reconstitute its weapons to deal with that threat if it could not reach a security agreement with the United States.
Ive never seen a what-if counterfactual about what the state of nuclear weapons in the Middle East would be right now if Saddam was still in charge in Iraq. Would there be international sanctions on him and Iran or would there be an international split between western nations over whom to support? Would Iran have scaled down its program for fear of another war with Saddam or as a concession to the west to get it to side with Tehran against Baghdad? Or would it have ramped up the program further in an out-and-out arms race with Iraq? Considering that the Iranian nuclear program was discovered in 2002, how much longer would Saddam have waited before restarting his own program? Once he did restart it, would that have reduced his pariah status in the region as neighboring Sunni nations rallied to his side against the Shiites? Or would it have set off mass nuclear proliferation across the region as Sunni leaders confronted the prospect of being threatened by Iran or the guy who tried to annex Kuwait? Its hard for me to imagine a scenario in which the region would be in better shape with a nuclear-armed Saddam lurking, but if any lefties want to try to convince me, have at it.
Elsewhere in WaPo, John Bolton says its time for the IAF to attack Irans nuclear sites. Id wait a bit longer in case Mousavi and the green revolution find their second wind and somehow knock out the mullahs, but his point about attacking at a moment when the public has never been more disaffected with the regime is well taken. The fear that striking Iran would drive Iranians back into the arms of the government has always been a deterrent, but in light of the schism over the past two weeks, its hard to imagine that happening. Theres no longer a relationship between the people and their rulers; such is the hatred, in fact, that I wonder how many of them would secretly thrill to seeing the Revolutionary Guards nose bloodied. Its a gamble, but the odds really never have been better.
No no no ... Bush lied. Didn’t the media verify that?????
I don’t entirely doubt that. He must have feared Iran more than us.
Or perhaps he thought he had WMD.
Or perhaps he did, but moved them to Syria.
I wonder what would have happened had we encouraged the Shah to take out the Baathist regime in the 1970’s (remember Iran, Israel and the US were supporting the Kurdish rebellion in Iraq until 1975).
It could have totally altered the dynamics of the Middle East.
Like they say - life is tough and its even tougher when you're stupid.
-Mark Twain
He had been bribing the UN’s Oil for Food heads and fully
expected the sanctions to be lifted soon. Then came 9/11.
That event changed everything.
JJ61
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.