Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam told FBI: I bluffed on WMD because I feared Iranian nukes
Hotair ^ | 7/2/2009 | Allahpundit

Posted on 07/02/2009 4:42:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Not only is this old news, but it’s old news I’ve written about multiple times. Why cover it again? Because: It can’t be stressed enough that as bad as the current nuclear standoff with Iran is, it could have been that much worse if a certain nutjob wild card was still part of the international deck.

Hussein’s fear of Iran, which he said he considered a greater threat than the United States, featured prominently in the discussion about weapons of mass destruction. Iran and Iraq had fought a grinding eight-year war in the 1980s, and Hussein said he was convinced that Iran was trying to annex southern Iraq — which is largely Shiite. “Hussein viewed the other countries in the Middle East as weak and could not defend themselves or Iraq from an attack from Iran,” Piro recounted in his summary of a June 11, 2004, conversation.

“The threat from Iran was the major factor as to why he did not allow the return of UN inspectors,” Piro wrote. “Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq.”

Hussein noted that Iran’s weapons capabilities had increased dramatically while Iraq’s weapons “had been eliminated by the UN sanctions,” and that eventually Iraq would have to reconstitute its weapons to deal with that threat if it could not reach a security agreement with the United States.

I’ve never seen a what-if counterfactual about what the state of nuclear weapons in the Middle East would be right now if Saddam was still in charge in Iraq. Would there be international sanctions on him and Iran or would there be an international split between western nations over whom to support? Would Iran have scaled down its program for fear of another war with Saddam or as a concession to the west to get it to side with Tehran against Baghdad? Or would it have ramped up the program further in an out-and-out arms race with Iraq? Considering that the Iranian nuclear program was discovered in 2002, how much longer would Saddam have waited before restarting his own program? Once he did restart it, would that have reduced his pariah status in the region as neighboring Sunni nations rallied to his side against the Shiites? Or would it have set off mass nuclear proliferation across the region as Sunni leaders confronted the prospect of being threatened by Iran or the guy who tried to annex Kuwait? It’s hard for me to imagine a scenario in which the region would be in better shape with a nuclear-armed Saddam lurking, but if any lefties want to try to convince me, have at it.

Elsewhere in WaPo, John Bolton says it’s time for the IAF to attack Iran’s nuclear sites. I’d wait a bit longer in case Mousavi and the green revolution find their second wind and somehow knock out the mullahs, but his point about attacking at a moment when the public has never been more disaffected with the regime is well taken. The fear that striking Iran would drive Iranians back into the arms of the government has always been a deterrent, but in light of the schism over the past two weeks, it’s hard to imagine that happening. There’s no longer a relationship between the people and their rulers; such is the hatred, in fact, that I wonder how many of them would secretly thrill to seeing the Revolutionary Guard’s nose bloodied. It’s a gamble, but the odds really never have been better.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bluff; fbi; iraniannukes; iraq; nukes; saddam; wmd

1 posted on 07/02/2009 4:42:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No no no ... Bush lied. Didn’t the media verify that?????


2 posted on 07/02/2009 4:45:17 PM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t entirely doubt that. He must have feared Iran more than us.

Or perhaps he thought he had WMD.

Or perhaps he did, but moved them to Syria.


3 posted on 07/02/2009 4:48:56 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2284178/posts


4 posted on 07/02/2009 4:49:43 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder what would have happened had we encouraged the Shah to take out the Baathist regime in the 1970’s (remember Iran, Israel and the US were supporting the Kurdish rebellion in Iraq until 1975).

It could have totally altered the dynamics of the Middle East.


5 posted on 07/02/2009 4:51:03 PM PDT by SolidWood (Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq.”

Like they say - life is tough and its even tougher when you're stupid.

6 posted on 07/02/2009 4:53:48 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"I'm not lying to you. I don't tell lies anymore, I've given it up....The field is overrun with amateurs...."

-Mark Twain

7 posted on 07/02/2009 5:01:09 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Saddam intentionally developed his commercial infrastructure
to be dual purpose. On the turn of a dime, he could have
his agricultural pesticide plants pumping out Anthrax, etc.

He had been bribing the UN’s Oil for Food heads and fully
expected the sanctions to be lifted soon. Then came 9/11.

That event changed everything.

JJ61

8 posted on 07/02/2009 6:38:10 PM PDT by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson