Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring

What are you saying? Are you criticizing those who have children? Sure sounds like it.


30 posted on 07/04/2009 9:00:05 AM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Theo; mkcc30; Marie2; mckenzie7
What are you saying? Are you criticizing those who have children? Sure sounds like it.

Where do you get that idea?

I'm criticizing a governmental system that is allowed to fine you for not acting the way it wants, even if both paths are legal. That's merely a disguised version of tyrrany.

Don't believe it? Think it's hyperbole? Consider the following...

Take two couples with identical incomes, and one has a child. The other couple, whether from life choice or infertility or whatever, will be penalized and have to pay higher taxes than the other.

If they try to be treated equitably and pay the same rate as the other couple, they can be imprisoned at gunpoint.

How is that not the government directing personal decisions at gunpoint? And will you support it if (or when) Congress and Obama pass a bill saying that your taxes will be higher than those who choose to "attend training sessions on the importance of community involvement" because they get a "deduction" for their activity?

The point is not that FReepers should not take these deductions--the point is that FReepers should be fighting against their very existence. That includes the whole "itemization" scam, too.

37 posted on 07/04/2009 10:29:34 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson