“But would Joe agree with you? Much of what he spoke about was being more inclusive”
OK, I stand corrected. I agree with MOST of what Joe said.
I did not understand what he meant by “more inclusive”.
Please enlighten me.
I wish I could. I know that "inclusive" frequently means guys like Colin Powell, who calls himself a Republican but has never voted for a Republican presidential candidate that I can find. Being inclusive also usually means supporting guys like Arlen Specter after the party kneecaps people like Toomey in the primaries.
This guy could mean that narrow-minded Republicans turned their backs on Coleman because he didn't pass the purity test, or that the party put a hack like Coleman in because they didn't want a conservative. From his letter, I have no idea which is the case.