Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama holds a fire sale of America's nuclear defences in Moscow
telegraph uk ^ | 7/09/2009 | Gerard Warner

Posted on 07/09/2009 12:15:54 PM PDT by Kevin Collins

No apologies for posting consecutively on Barack Obama: the Looney Tunes President’s sell-out of US and Western interests is proceeding at such a speed that it is difficult to keep pace. Well said, Nile Gardiner, for asking if Barack Obama is the most naïve president in American history. The answer is undoubtedly yes – unless he has a secret agenda to cut America down to size. For America voluntarily to reduce its nuclear superiority is madness. Bien-pensant talk of a nuclear-free world displays total stupidity in a global situation where nuclear weaponry is proliferating, not receding. There is even a nuclear bomb in Pakistan, which is teetering on the brink of failed statehood at the hands of Islamist insurgents. Is this a time for America to disarm, to “sell the store” as one trenchant right-wing commentator has already described Obama’s posturing in Moscow?

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: carter; irreparable; naive; obama
Obama & Putin (forbidden love) AT LEAST OBAMA DIDN'T BOW TO PUTIN. MOVE OVER JIMMY CARTER, OBAMA IS THE MOST NAIVE PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE U.S. FOUR YEARS OF THIS IS GOING TO IRREPARABLY DAMAGE THE COUNTRY. WAKE UP AMERICA ir·rep·a·ra·ble (-rpr--bl) adj. Impossible to repair, rectify, or amend: irreparable harm; irreparable damages.
1 posted on 07/09/2009 12:15:54 PM PDT by Kevin Collins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

Yalta II


2 posted on 07/09/2009 12:18:36 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

I simply cannot see the point of Obama crawling to the kremlin to surrender to Putin. We beat the Soviet’s ass 20 years ago, and Russia today is a 3rd-world country. Obama is channeling Jimmy Carter from some 70’s time warp.


3 posted on 07/09/2009 12:30:37 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

He is not naive. He knows what he is doing. He said he would do this during the campaign. He wants to disarm America.

Anyone who read Jerome Corsi’s book Obama nation before the election knew this was part of BHO’s agenda all along.

BHO is no fool. The people who elected him are the real fools.


4 posted on 07/09/2009 12:32:15 PM PDT by Welcome2thejungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

This is TWO British editorials in the same day who elude to either Obama being stupid or intentionally tearing down America.

When will our own media, even the conservative op-ed’s grow a pair enough to examine this question?


5 posted on 07/09/2009 12:58:02 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins
Best line from the article

"...it is a feel-good news conference and photo opportunity that will create huge approval ratings on liberal campuses where the delusions of 1968 and the anti-Vietnam war movement still linger on in these isolated Jurassic Parks.

Include San Francisco, Berkely, and other cities as political Jurrasic Parks.

6 posted on 07/09/2009 12:59:23 PM PDT by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins
Well said, Nile Gardiner, for asking if Barack Obama is the most naïve president in American history.

Totally ignored by the US Media Brothel.

7 posted on 07/09/2009 1:43:51 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Speaking of 1968, etc, his mom would be proud of him....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham

Maybe Barry's diaper wasn't red, but it sure was pink.

8 posted on 07/09/2009 2:17:37 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

No one Obama’s age is this naive. He is the Manchurian (probably saudi actually) Candidate.


9 posted on 07/09/2009 2:18:07 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Collins

Obama is nothing but a socialist who took on the clothing of the democratic party. he is moving at break neck speeds to destroy America as fast as he can with his spending and creating debt.
His attempt at making us weaker has happened virtually overnight. The damage from his policies will not be felt for about 3 years but when they are America will be at third rate nation unable to pick herself up again.

He is worse than a Manchurian candidate, because he knows and understands what he is doing fully. Unfortunately his supporters are taking too long to wake up. When they do, it will be too late to undo all the damage that he has done.


10 posted on 07/11/2009 11:13:45 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Not for a while. Slowly, bit by bit they are starting to come out of their trance. A piece in USA Today here, a piece in the Washington times there .. occasionally a piece in fox.

It will progressively roll until he is more hated than Bush ever was.

The problem is how much damage will have been done by then and can we undo it?


11 posted on 07/11/2009 11:15:35 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson