Posted on 07/09/2009 8:13:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
15 have already been proved to be false... and 11 are by the same person that has filed many in this latest batch. You must be part and parcel of the evilcrat party. Do not respond to me any further.
LLS
‘If she wants to be prez in 2012 and by the time she left the governor’s chair it will be early 2011.’
As i understand her original term ends in 2010 not 2011.
It does not seem clear what Sarah has in mind regarding a 2012 run, I dont see her doing a Reagan like speech building nationwide tour, she does not the ability to do it.
The elections are in LATE 2010 (November 2, 2010)...handover of power is early 2011. If she left in 2010, it would of been the same gripes and complaints from the anklebiters. She would then have to form an exploritory committees, form contacts, and do all the things she has to do if she’s wants to move on to other things
Meanwhile, her legal bills from bogus complaints continue and her reputation gets smeared. It would leave her with little time for 2012 (or anything else). Mittens and Huckster are free to go about.
Even if isn’t a run for 2012, she couldn’t get the job done because of stonewalling and bogus ethics complaints (they are even recycling the SAME complaints now) which costs the filers NOTHING. Alaskan citizens were getting caught in the middle of a political snipe hunt while getting pegged with the administrative costs.
Did you even read my last post?
What a load of crap. You’re either playing coy, dumb, supporting another horse in the race, live in a sanitized world or can’t see the buzz she generates. If she didn’t have that ability, her rivals wouldn’t be trying to DESTROY her with Alinsky tactics!
Already, Iowa and New Hampshire GOP groups want Sarah to vist their states. They accept her reasons for resigning and want her to speak at their functions.
No matter her choice, the game’s afoot. She’s free now.
[-—————————————————]
[When Sarah twitters....the libs get embittered.]
[-—————————————————]
Then you obviously do not know what either one looks like. I’m not a Republican in name only or otherwise and I have never given a cent to McCain or Romney, nor have I worked for either. But then none of that means anything to you. All you know is that anyone that does not agree with you must be a “RINO McRomney-bot”. Calling people names is so much easier than deep thought and intelligent discussion. People like you would be funny if you weren’t so sad (well actually your mindless rants are quite amusing).
Supposedly in 2012 the GOP will employ what they call the “Ohio Plan” Small states vote in Feb and big states in March.
IA and NH will still be first though cause no one has the pills to call BS on that setup. I’m sure all the people that flock to those states every 4 years is no small boost to their economies.
“near criminal farm subsidies “
Near? I wouldn’t be so kind.
‘If she didn’t have that ability, her rivals wouldn’t be trying to DESTROY her with Alinsky tactics!’
I haven’t seen Palin give a speech( apart from the Republican convention) which shows that she has the intellectual ability to promote conservatism.
It is early days yet and the first speech she is going to give in Simi valley will point to what she can achieve.
Reagan did it with years of radio broadcasts, essays, speeches to party activists , conventions etc... it is just early to comment on Palin’s ability.
I haven’t seen Palin give a speech( apart from the Republican convention) which shows that she has the intellectual ability to promote conservatism.
Then you haven’t been trying. It’s called YouTube.
I have this feeling that she could hit it out of the park yet you would still roll your eyes and shake your head. Just admit it and stop playing coy.
Hey, I’ve heard Mitty gives a good speech...so does Obambi. Maybe you should hitch your tent with them. They’re well educated and come from the finest of social clubs. Perhaps they even play polo and recite Urdu poetry?
‘Hey, I’ve heard Mitty gives a good speech...so does Obambi. Maybe you should hitch your tent with them.’
This is a needless distractive argument, just because I am not yet convinced by Palin’s intellectual capability it does not mean I am enamoured by Obama’s or Mitt’s speech skills.
As i said the comparision here is with Reagan who spent years on speech giving, essays etc..Palin is just in the beginning stage before she can prove that she can match Reagan likewise.
Well I am convinced of her abilities because, unlike you, I have faith and I HAVE heard her speak. Perhaps you need to seek this out instead of having it spoonfed to you.
Psssst.....it’s called YouTube, Team Sarah and Conservatives4Palin. Nice material there, but you wouldn’t understand.
And I find your postings a rather needless distractive argument. The world is moving, you can either make it happen, watch it happen or wonder what happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.