.jpg)
Posted on 07/10/2009 3:55:43 PM PDT by ThePanFromJapan
We need to go after the individual activists as well. Just tie the up so they can’t do their “job”. Like that fat whore in AK.
Seventeen for seventeen previous bogus ones should give you a clue.
If we know who the activists are and where they live, we could have people watch them and photograph them in embarrassing situations, like paparazzi. You know, get pictures of them going to the grocery store, looking like street people. Take pictures of their homes, their kids, tell them that they are celebrities because of their opposition to Palin and so the public has a right to know who they are.
If she was truly smart, she would file a $10 million lawsuit naming each and every frivolous plaintiff that has filed in the last 18 months.””
Perhaps when she is no longer Governor, she can do exactly that.....Perhaps she needed to be free to do exactly that.
Yep.... accomplishments but left some undone it seems...
I hate it when that happens in the middle of an argument!
Oh, well. The weekend awaits. Cheers.
Sorry about the timing.
***So we must all just assume this is untrue because we like her?***
Sounds like you dont.
Have you asked that question over at DU?
0bama was accepting speaking fees while he was in the Senate, which violates the US Senate ethics laws. How come no one filed a complaint?
Have they tried accusing her yet of flying to Chicago for a date night at taxpayer expense? That one just might stick, it sounds criminal enough! :-)
Just so I don't make the same egregious error, what the heck did that poster do to get banned?
I don’t know but looking back through the posts it sure looks like humblegunner started it....sheesh.
It must be in some sort of code because I sure as heck don’t see it.
I can't stand Kieth Olberman, but if I heard he was being accused of a crime I would still assume he's innocent, because I'll put my trust in the Constitution over that of a psychotic little twerp like Ward any day.
And what assumption have I made exactly?
Nice answer LMAO
Tells me all I need to know.
Simple. You're making the assumption that because the complaint was filed, there's a possibility there could be something to it. Read your post.
Most of us are assuming the opposite. It's frivolous. But, either way it's an assumption. We, at least, admit it.
It’s not ONE compnay.....it’s a TON of companies....look at how many interviews she has done. SHE has to PAAY for ALL the LEGAL work to get these xompanies to testify that they DIDN’T pay her!
Because someone MIS-SPELLS you think thay are a MORON?? Wow, hunblegunner, you sure are NOT HUMBLE!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.