Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newroark

“government’s established authority to set terms and conditions for sale of pharmaceutical drugs through a licensed network of dealers “

Actually, the government has no constitutional authority to regulate in-State commerce and they have abused their constitutional interstate commerce authority, which was not to regulate products but to regulate State actions and primarily taxation.

Second, we are talking about what companies do not want to sell not what they do want to sell. By no means does the government have the authority to mandate someone sell anything. What are they going to do, grab people in the middle of the night and say, “You’re coming with us, you’ve got some selling to do!”?


26 posted on 07/12/2009 7:13:50 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
LOL, the state government is the one doing the telling, are rather a board set up as the regulatory authority. So where does interstate commerce have anything to do with this case.
29 posted on 07/12/2009 8:18:08 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson