Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Intentions Aside, Are We Killing the Patient? (Obama killing the economy)
New York Times ^ | July 11, 2009 | Ben Stein

Posted on 07/12/2009 7:03:33 AM PDT by reaganaut1

...

What is President Obama doing about [the recession]? Perhaps too much. And, possibly, his efforts are too diffuse. When I think about the economy I think about a plump man who has just been hit by a truck while crossing a street and is in severely critical condition with internal bleeding. Instead of just stabilizing his hemorrhaging, the doctor decides that while the patient is unconscious, he might as well also do a face lift, some coronary bypasses and a stomach-stapling to keep him from gaining weight while he is recovering (if he does recover). After all, a crisis is not to be wasted.

The problem is that all these ambitious operations create too much of a burden for the human body to bear.

Similarly, we have an administration that is simultaneously seeking to end the recession, discussing drastic changes to laws on foreclosures and energy use and completely changing the health care system. I respectfully question whether all of this makes sense.

I don’t believe we need to do something radical about energy, but even assuming that we do, why do it right now? Do we need to take one of the few sectors that is working like clockwork through the recession — oil refining — and wring its neck by making it pay for pollution “cap and trade” credits? Why attack a healthy industry when so many other sectors are ill? What is all of this anger at Big Oil, which has not done anything blameworthy, all about? Why endlessly beat up the companies that keep the country going?

All history is the history of class struggle, as Marx said, and I suspect that the rage of the news media and academic classes against the oil industry is a form of class struggle.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: agenda; benstein; bho44; bhoeconomy; capandtrade; democrats; economy; oil; second100days; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: reaganaut1

Milktoast article.


21 posted on 07/12/2009 8:27:54 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
[Stein is such an obama apologist.]

Stein is an okay guy and to the right of center but he his pretty lightweight as an economist.

22 posted on 07/12/2009 8:29:05 AM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It is Obama’s intention to bring the economy to its knees so that he may rebuild it in a Marxist manner.


23 posted on 07/12/2009 8:42:21 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hey Obama, spread my work ethic, not my wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorilla_warrior
Obama’s plan all along has been to destroy the economy and replace it with global totalitarian marxism.

Stein knows this, but he's hoping none of the sheeple notice before it's a done deal.

24 posted on 07/12/2009 8:44:35 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“When I think about the economy I think about a plump man who has just been hit by a truck while crossing a street and is in severely critical condition with internal bleeding. Instead of just stabilizing his hemorrhaging, the doctor decides that while the patient is unconscious, he might as well also do a face lift, some coronary bypasses and a stomach-stapling to keep him from gaining weight while he is recovering (if he does recover). After all, a crisis is not to be wasted.”

This analogy falls quite short, as far as I’m concerned. No, it’s like performing the facelift, bypasses, and stomach staple using completely unproven or already-proven-defective techniques; or techniques designed to enrich the hospital staff; or experimental techniques based on faulty science and/or idealogical speculation. Take your pick. And using blithering pretzel logic to argue in favor of these questionable techniques. As long as there is no basis in fact; as long as there is strict adherence to Alinskis’ principles, as long as there is slavish devotion to Marxist, anti-Constitutional beliefs, any hare-brained scheme these idiots want to try out is fair game. It’s not the future of a great nation that’s at stake, it’s a selfish and disgusting tantrum of self-re-electing pandering. It’s an experiment in mass psychology, with a deliberate infliction of terror on multiple fronts.

And of course the argument is always “nobody in history is as smart as we are, so prior experience applies to the application our brilliance”. Which, in itself, is totally belied by the completely incompetent and corrupt machinations of the likes of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and the documentable results of their self-aggrandizing nonsense.


25 posted on 07/12/2009 11:49:41 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (What kind of organization answers the phone if you call a suicide hotline in Gaza City?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There are NO good intentions by the communists as they destroy us.


26 posted on 07/13/2009 11:15:29 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (BLOAT - Buy lots of ammo today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson