[Vaquero]

only the King of Pop(ping young boys)
was .....

...GUILTY...

...As his payoff of $22 millions (and his plying kids with wine and sleeping with them) proved.

[Balding_Eagle]

That payoff didn’t prove anything other than it was cheaper to pay $25 million and get it all over with.

[libstripper]

Odly enough, the Daily Kos has one of the best accounts of the $20,000,000 settlement case, one that includes excerpts from the transcript snd serious corroborating evidence, including the complaininng witness accurately describing Jackson's rather uniquely marked genitals, a description somewhat like Paula Jones' description of Clinton's. That's the kind of case where I'd be happy to vote guilty, if I were on the jury. Jackson's second case, the one that was heavily reported a couple of years ago, didn't involve any such evidence; hence, I'd have voted not guilty in that case, since jurors are only to consider the evidence actually presented.