[libstripper]

The problem with Jackson's second case is the prosecution just did not present the necesssry corroborating evidence to raise it beyond a "he said, he said" case. OTOH, the one that resulted in the about $20,000,000 settlement had such evidence in the form of the complaining witness accurately describing unique characteristice of Jackson's gentitals and Jackson's bedroom alarm system that prevented people from stumbling in on Jackson while he was buggering kids. Legal fairness to everyone, like the man who was framed in the article, necessarily means applying basic due process rules to a vile slug like Jackson, and letting such an individual walk when there isn't adequate evidence in the specific case to convict him.

[wardaddy]

I agree the second case seem flawed and the witness and family were not terribly sympathetic