Posted on 07/12/2009 2:46:43 PM PDT by mapmaker77
Which of these acts are illegal in the USA?
Defending your country against suicidal terrorists who have no compunction about killing anyone who gets in their way,
OR,
Being the nobel prize winning co-founder and spokesman of a cult?
I'll be really curious to see if anything comes of this, but I will say this:
We have come to a place where some judge is going to rule on the legality of defending yourself and your country against bloodthirsty barbarians. But it's apparently OK to try to wreck the economy and indoctrinate our children into some pseudo-religious nonsense like a bunch of druids.
This is so rediculous that I find it hard to believe that it is news. Welcome to the dnc USSA.
Well......rediculous is as rediculous does.
There was never even the most microscopic question of legality.
Combatants on the battle field not wearing uniform have zero rights and protection of any kind.
That was one of the very first laws of war ever agreed to among nations, and it is still among the most important rules designed to protect the civilian populace.
Crooked judges have invented this an issue to advance a partisan political issue.
It’s easy for a looser to stand on the sidelines and redicule. It’s a lot tougher to get series.
Go you one better ...
... as a former member of the United States armed forces, I took an oath of enlistment that bound me to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic ...” I believe that oath remains in effect, all these years later, and applies to millions of veterans.
So, how far am I (we) allowed to go in defense of the Constitution? And on whose authority?
Just curious ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.