[count-your-change]

It was Zogby that did the poll not The Discovery Institute, and your attempt at impugning the poll because it does not reflect what you want it to fails just as much as trying to spin weakness in Darwinism as something other than evidence against it.

Actually I would expect the Darwinist poll to ask for a choosing of teaching Darwinism on the one hand or child abuse on the other, an idea I think will become the theme in The Temple of Darwinism.

[DevNet]

Do you find that childish name calling helps you convert people to your cause?

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

It was Zogby that did the poll not The Discovery Institute,

Zogby carried out the poll, but DI "commissioned" it. That mean DI wrote the questions and paid Zogby to call people up and ask them. They like to call it a "Zogby poll" because that makes it sound more objective than it really is. I could pay Zogby to ask people my questions, too.

I'm not impugning the poll because it doesn't reflect what I want it to, I'm impugning the writer because it doesn't say what he claims it does. And "weakness" is not the same thing as "evidence against," though I know that distinction is lost on most creationists.