Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA mulls assassination missions
Washington Post/Daily Camera ^ | October 28, 2001 | Barton Gellman

Posted on 07/14/2009 2:29:25 PM PDT by Shermy

WASHINGTON — Armed with new authority from President Bush for a global campaign against al-Qaida, the Central Intelligence Agency is contemplating clandestine missions expressly aimed at killing specified individuals for the first time since the assassination scandals and consequent legal restraints of the 1970s.

Drawing on two classified legal memoranda, one written for President Bill Clinton in 1998 and one since the attacks of Sept. 11, the Bush administration has concluded that executive orders banning assassination do not prevent the president from lawfully singling out a terrorist for death by covert action. The CIA is reluctant to accept a broad grant of authority to hunt and kill U.S. enemies at its discretion, knowledgeable sources said. But the agency is willing and believes itself able to take the lives of terrorists designated by the president.

Clinton authorized covert lethal force against al-Qaida beginning in 1998, and The Washington Post reported last Sunday that Bush has signed a more encompassing intelligence "finding" that calls for attacks on newly identified weaknesses in Osama bin Laden's communications, security apparatus and infrastructure.

...

Bush and his national security Cabinet have been plain about their intention to find and kill bin Laden, the al-Qaida leader the administration blames for the Sept. 11 attacks.

(Excerpt) Read more at web.dailycamera.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; bartongellman; binladen; cia; gwot; manhunt; obl; september12era
The complete article scrubbed from Post website.

For your enjoyment.

1 posted on 07/14/2009 2:29:26 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Isn’t it a fundamental job of the CIA to assassinate people?


2 posted on 07/14/2009 2:30:14 PM PDT by Niuhuru (The internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

CIA Mulls assassinations...

Hmm I wonder if they are thinking what I’m thinking.


3 posted on 07/14/2009 2:32:21 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Yeah, it got scrubbed after I posted it here this morning.

Coincidence?

4 posted on 07/14/2009 2:33:47 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Send that article to the Democratic Congress. They seem to have been in the dark since 2001.


5 posted on 07/14/2009 2:34:17 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Nancy didn’t get the paper that morning... and her dog ate her briefing papers...


6 posted on 07/14/2009 2:34:26 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

“The Washington Post reported last Sunday that Bush has signed a more encompassing intelligence “finding” that calls for attacks on newly identified weaknesses in Osama bin Laden’s communications, security apparatus and infrastructure.”

There’s another article to find!


7 posted on 07/14/2009 2:36:45 PM PDT by Shermy (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Ha,ha,ha, you know this was leaked to the Post by the Demorats in the first place to embarrass Bush.


8 posted on 07/14/2009 2:38:13 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Just checked...the October 21 Post article is scrubbed too!


9 posted on 07/14/2009 2:39:12 PM PDT by Shermy (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

I’m not sure which is more embarrassing. The Democrats not knowing CIA was going after AQ operators, or the Democrats pretending not to know. Exposing the operation to the press, or ordering it terminated when we still haven’t got them all yet.

Maybe the most embarrassing part of it is their belief that exposing it would make Cheney look bad somehow. Thats just silly.


10 posted on 07/14/2009 2:42:39 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Just checked...the October 21 Post article is scrubbed too!

Of course...what'd you expect? We gotta get screen shots of these articles and get them archived somewhere where they can't get to them.

11 posted on 07/14/2009 2:43:39 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Winston Smith, hard at work.


12 posted on 07/14/2009 2:50:23 PM PDT by ditchdigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marron

“or the Democrats pretending not to know.”

The whole point of the letter over the weekend was to insinuate the CIA “lied”, without saying what about, but hoping questions would not be asked because they invoked ChENEY!! All to help Pelosi’s obsession of proving she is not a liar.

Did not work. They did not think it through.


13 posted on 07/14/2009 2:50:36 PM PDT by Shermy (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

October 21 Article found!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2292553/posts


14 posted on 07/14/2009 2:52:55 PM PDT by Shermy (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Check your url.


16 posted on 07/14/2009 2:54:53 PM PDT by Shermy (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All; Admin Moderator
Oops don't know how that happened. My bad. Try here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2292355/posts?page=52#52

Mod, please delete my last post on this thread, as I got the link all wrong, based upon another post I did for a Palin thread. Thanx!

17 posted on 07/14/2009 2:56:52 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

The law forbids us from killing heads of governments. Even Clinton said it was legal to kill OBL. However, Clinton ain’t in charge, is he.


18 posted on 07/14/2009 3:16:49 PM PDT by Terry Mross ( I hate all politicians. Including republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson