Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space Station Is Near Completion, Maybe the End
Washington Post ^ | Monday, July 13, 2009 | Joel Achenbach

Posted on 07/14/2009 7:27:22 PM PDT by edge10

A number of times in recent weeks a bright, unblinking light has appeared in the night sky of the nation's capital: a spaceship. Longer than a football field, weighing 654,000 pounds, the spaceship moved swiftly across the heavens and vanished.

Fortunately, it was one of ours.

The international space station is by far the largest spacecraft ever built by earthlings. Circling the Earth every 90 minutes, it often passes over North America and is visible from the ground when night has fallen but the station, up high, is still bathed in sunlight.

After more than a decade of construction, it is nearing completion and finally has a full crew of six astronauts. The last components should be installed by the end of next year.

And then?

"In the first quarter of 2016, we'll prep and de-orbit the spacecraft," says NASA's space station program manager, Michael T. Suffredini.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2009 7:27:22 PM PDT by edge10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: edge10
we'll prep and de-orbit the spacecraft

de-orbit, cool word. Kinda like other areas, as we de-orbit the auto industry, de-orbit the oil industry, de-orbit the coal industry, ...

3 posted on 07/14/2009 7:31:46 PM PDT by C210N (A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screenombre
What an expensive exercise in absolute futility.

Stupid. It will have been under construction longer than it will have been complete.
4 posted on 07/14/2009 7:32:24 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C210N

I wish Obama would de-orbit my butt.


5 posted on 07/14/2009 7:34:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

It will probably stay up years longer,
once THEY arrive...


6 posted on 07/14/2009 7:34:59 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

So sad to see NASA and space exploration become another pig at the trough. The shuttle program has lingered 20 years too long now we have this white elephant hanging over our heads.


7 posted on 07/14/2009 7:40:39 PM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edge10

Get rid of NASA and award prizes to private companies for 1/10th the cost.


8 posted on 07/14/2009 7:48:30 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

“What an expensive exercise in absolute futility.”

Agree. Let’s see, at, say $3B per year to keep up there - if we de-orbited it tomorrow, that would free up $30B or so over the next 10 years for much more important stuff...like helping Obama fund his health care take over.

(do you seriously think that NASA will ever see a penny out of this program if it is canceled...there are MUCH higher priorities in this administration)


9 posted on 07/14/2009 7:49:35 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edge10

“The rap on the space station has always been that it was built primarily to give the space shuttle somewhere to go. Now, with the shuttle being retired at the end of 2010, the station is on the spot. U.S. astronauts will be able to reach the station only by getting rides on Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft.”

_______________________________________________________________________________

That’s the straight-up truth. The ISS never had a real, purpose beyond that. It’s been a matter of dreaming up various odds and ends and errands for it.


10 posted on 07/14/2009 7:58:06 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

This is like the set-up for a SciFi short story, where the troubled, obsolete, and soon to be de-orbited ISS is suddenly thrust into a cosmically pivotal role by dint of circumstance ... but what would it be ?


11 posted on 07/14/2009 8:01:57 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edge10

Wait...

We spent all this money, and time building this thing, and it’s not staying up there?

Do I have this right?

Good grief.

I need M&M’s.


12 posted on 07/14/2009 8:10:05 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edge10

Maybe the Chinese will buy it?


13 posted on 07/14/2009 8:10:07 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Democrats have nothing to fear but Palin being herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Agree. Let’s see, at, say $3B per year to keep up there - if we de-orbited it tomorrow, that would free up $30B or so over the next 10 years for much more important stuff...like helping Obama fund his health care take over.

I don't understand de-orbiting at all. Send up some rockets to push it out to the L-5 point and leave it there. We might need the metal someday for some other purpose.

We spent enough to get that stuff out of the gravity well, might as well leave it.
14 posted on 07/14/2009 8:12:05 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edge10

How cool... $100 billion for naught. We don’t have a plan for it? Ah what a waste of money, it would have paid for a Mars mission


15 posted on 07/14/2009 8:16:08 PM PDT by GeronL ( Patriotic Insurrectionist at http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

The Chinese might give us a nickel on the dollar for it.... uh oh... the Russians want to keep their portion intact for their next station


16 posted on 07/14/2009 8:18:41 PM PDT by GeronL ( Patriotic Insurrectionist at http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I don't understand de-orbiting at all. Send up some rockets to push it out to the L-5 point and leave it there.

We don't have that capability, it would probably be too fragile to move even if we did, and it is designed for LEO (for example, it would have inadequate shielding for operation anywhere else so people couldn't live there).

Hopefully the Indians or the Chinese will have the capability to operate it and be willing to do so. It would be useful for the Chinese as a stepping stone to their moon base.

We've got more important things to spend money on, like health care, arts funding, and government web sites.

17 posted on 07/14/2009 8:52:54 PM PDT by Technogeeb (The only good Russian is a dead Russian. Rest in Peace, Solzhenitsyn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb
We don't have that capability, it would probably be too fragile to move even if we did, and it is designed for LEO (for example, it would have inadequate shielding for operation anywhere else so people couldn't live there).

I meant keep it in space for the resources, not as a functioning space station. We spent a lot of money to get that metal out of the gravity well. That metal might be useful later for other purposes.
18 posted on 07/14/2009 10:32:51 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: edge10
we'll prep and de-orbit the spacecraft

Is it big enough to fit all of Congress in it?

19 posted on 07/14/2009 10:37:45 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edge10; Technogeeb; Arkinsaw

Why do people who want the U.S. to de-industrialize because they can’t bear the risk of greenhouse gases melting glaciers so anxious to de-orbit our huge spaceship?

I’m old enough to remember when the idea of space travel raised goose pimples on any kid who just discovered that he liked girls. Our political elite, on the other hand, are the kind of people who like to think that the lunar landings in the late 60’s and early 70’s are a hoax.

If our country ever manages to grow a generation that finds the idea of going to the moon more exciting than green cars, sushi, and gay marriage, they might have an irresistible curiosity about how that wandering bright light got up there. An unbearable prospect to the Nancy Pelosis and Henry Waxmans of the world.


20 posted on 07/14/2009 10:47:19 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson