Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LearsFool

Actually, in concept, that’s what the left is all about,

using the State to try to counter-act the consequences of breaking God’s natural laws.

Lazy? Starve. vs Lazy? Have the State steal others’ income for you.

Want sex? Get married. vs Want sex? Go ahead, the State will alleviate all consequences.

Get a disease from promiscuousness? Example to others.
vs
Get HIV? Have the State research and pay for drugs to keep you alive.


15 posted on 07/15/2009 5:48:20 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

That’s true. But the fact that they have to devise “work-arounds” points up their impotence.

Francis Bacon said, “Nature can only be commanded by being obeyed.” Yet we are to pretend that unnatural sexual acts were made natural by the ruling of a judge? And we’re to even make-believe that two shacked-up perverts can be metamorphosed into a married couple by the stroke of a legislator’s pen?

Sorry, I don’t buy it. Until these hubristic usurpers can decree that there will be no ill consequences of defying natural law - and make it stick - their proclamations and “decisions” ring rather hollow.

In short, if they can’t back their claims to authority, I’m skeptical when they tell me that “sodomy is natural and good”, or that “these two sodomites are now married.” It’s their word against the whole Creation - and their word looks like an empty claim.


16 posted on 07/15/2009 6:11:44 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson