Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: combat_boots

“A World Health Organization study released last year put Canadian life expectancy at birth at 79.8 years, Japan’s at 81.9 and America’s at 77.3! Dr. Stephen Bezruchka of the School of Public Health at the University of Washington in Seattle was quoted in the above LA Times story: “There isn’t a single measure in which the U.S. excels in the health arena. We spend half of the world’s healthcare bill and we are less healthy than all the other rich countries.”


8 posted on 07/15/2009 8:58:13 AM PDT by Cardhu (Be happy, today you will be the youngest you will ever be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Cardhu; combat_boots
WRONG!

Is Government-Run Health Care Better? Proponents of government-run health care argue that Americans will receive better care despite the foregoing. Their main argument has been that despite paying more for health care the United States trails other countries in infant mortality and average life expectancy.

However, neither is a good measure of the quality of a country's health care system. Each depends more on genetic makeup, personal lifestyle (including diet and physical activity), education, and environment than available health care. For example, in their book The Business of Health, Robert L. Ohsfeldt and John E. Schneider found that if it weren't for our high rate of deaths from homicides and car accidents Americans would have the highest life expectancy.

Infant mortality statistics are difficult to compare because other countries don't count as live births infants below a certain weight or gestational age. June E. O'Neill and Dave M. O'Neill found that Canada's infant mortality would be higher than ours if Canadians had as many low-weight births (the U.S. has almost three times as many teen mothers, who tend to give birth to lower-weight infants).

A better measure of a country's health care is how well it actually treats patients. The CONCORD study published in 2008 found that the five-year survival rate for cancer (adjusted for other causes of death) is much higher in the United States than in Europe (e.g., 91.9% vs. 57.1% for prostate cancer, 83.9% vs. 73% for breast cancer, 60.1% vs. 46.8% for men with colon cancer, and 60.1 vs. 48.4% for women with colon cancer). The United Kingdom, which has had government-run health care since 1948, has survival rates lower than those for Europe as a whole.

Proponents of government-run health care argue that more preventive care will be provided. However, a 2007 Commonwealth Fund report comparing the U.S., Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/the_cost_of_free_government_he_1.html go back to drinking

12 posted on 07/15/2009 12:12:47 PM PDT by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cardhu
Japan’s at 81.9 and America’s at 77.3

Japan doesn't have 30 million illegal aliens, whose life expectancy would be lower than legal residents.

17 posted on 07/15/2009 1:50:10 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson