Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Following Two Days of Hearings, 90% Expect Sotomayor to Be Confirmed
Rasmussen Reports ^ | July 15, 2009 | Staff

Posted on 07/16/2009 8:09:00 AM PDT by Iron Munro

Following the first two days of confirmation hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor, voters overwhelmingly expect her to be confirmed for the U.S. Supreme Court but remain divided as to whether she should be.

Ninety percent (90%) now say her confirmation is likely while only four percent (4%) say it is not.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 37% of voters now favor her confirmation while 43% are opposed. Importantly, those who are undecided have a positive view of President Obama and are probably willing to give him and his nominee the benefit of the doubt.

Today’s results are based upon polling conducted Monday and Tuesday nights, the first two days of the hearings. Yesterday’s results were based upon polling conducted Sunday and Monday night.

In our Tuesday morning write-up of the results, we noted that the single night data from Monday night showed improvement for Sotomayor. However, that improvement did notcarry over to last night’s polling. At this point, it is impossible to know whether Monday’s uptick in support was statistical noise or a substantive change.

Current support for the nominee remains consistent with the results found in late June when 37% were in favor of her confirmation and 39% were opposed.

Rasmussen Reports will continue tracking support for Sotomayor’s confirmation on a daily basis during the confirmation hearings. Results will be updated each morning at 10:30 EDT. Premium Members can get an advance look at the daily numbers in the Daily Briefing from Scott Rasmussen.

Voters remain evenly divided in the views of Sotomayor. Forty-seven percent (47%) have a favorable opinion of her, including 20% very favorable. Forty-six percent (46%) view her unfavorably, with 24% very unfavorable. These numbers also have remained largely the same since her nomination was announced.

Forty-eight percent (48%) view her ideology as politically liberal while 32% say she is a moderate.

The partisan divide over the nominee is predictable. By a three-to-one margin, Democrats say Sotomayor should be confirmed, and by a similar margin Republicans hold the opposite view. Fifty-five percent (55%) of those not affiliated with either major party oppose her confirmation.

Eighty-three percent (83%) also say the U.S. legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2009polls; scotus; sotomayor
Only 37% of voters polled now favor her confirmation.

Yet Lindsey Graham and other republicans were ready to throw in the towel before the hearings even began.

Democrats claw, bite, kick and scratch to win, all the time, every time.
Republicans spend their time trying to explain why they will lose before the fight is even joined.
.

1 posted on 07/16/2009 8:09:00 AM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Following Two Days of Hearings, 90% Expect Sotomayor to Be Confirmed

I wish I could teach my dog to roll over as quickly as these RINOs.

2 posted on 07/16/2009 8:12:05 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Restore The Constitution - Remove The Kenyan Usurper! ---- FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Everybody knew this was a done deal and that the Dim-controlled Senate hearings were just kabuki theater.


3 posted on 07/16/2009 8:12:52 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

You speak the truth. Shame on the GOP. Not my party any more.


4 posted on 07/16/2009 8:12:53 AM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Democrats claw, bite, kick and scratch to win, all the time, every time. Republicans spend their time trying to explain why they will lose before the fight is even joined.

And there it is, Folks. The God's honest truth.

Well said.

5 posted on 07/16/2009 8:13:03 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
And then we'll have a card-carrying Racist on the Supreme Court.

LA RAZA!

6 posted on 07/16/2009 8:13:24 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

It may have been an unwinnable fight with the Senate firmly controlled by Democrats. But if the GOP can’t show some backbone as the minority to fight for what is right, they are never going to be the majority again.


7 posted on 07/16/2009 8:17:30 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
I am no RINO, but count me as part of the 90%.

Judge Sotomayor is a racist, sexist, incompetent left-wing idiot. She has no business on the Supreme Court. But remember, the leaders of the Democrime Party are Pelosi, Reid, and The Obamination-- why should they object to her?And remember, there's always Ruth "Buzzy" Ginsberg the eugenicist on the Court already.

I will say this though--for all of you despairing about RINOS in the Senate-- Sotomayor got a tougher reception than Ginsberg.

8 posted on 07/16/2009 8:21:11 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

the more things that this Congress rams through that the majority opposes, the closer they all get to the end of the plank


9 posted on 07/16/2009 8:21:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Are there any dems willing to vote against her?


10 posted on 07/16/2009 8:39:34 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
NOOOOOOO to Sotomaryor

U. S. Senate

11 posted on 07/16/2009 8:42:55 AM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Ain't that the truth. My Dad has always referred to the Republican party as the "wimp party." I now understand why and ask my self now more than ever before why I bother staying affiliated with them. In the past I'd justify it to be able to vote in the primaries for the most conservative candidate. The problem is the party establishment undermines the conservative by pushing the RINOS who go on to win and then lose the general election.

To paraphrase Zell Miller, - I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me.
12 posted on 07/16/2009 9:16:46 AM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Oh please....100% expect her to be confirmed...After all, she's a wise Latino woman with a legal background.

P.S. Ex-hubby was obviously not a wise choice!!

13 posted on 07/16/2009 9:22:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Plank’s Law:

“The more things that this Congress rams through that the majority opposes, the closer they all get to the end of the plank”

;)


14 posted on 07/16/2009 2:12:50 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson