Skip to comments.Judge Tosses Prop. 8 Challenge, OKs Removal of Calif. from DOMA Suit
Posted on 07/18/2009 8:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Traditional marriage advocates on Friday lauded the order of a federal judge to remove the state of California as a defendant in a lawsuit challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
They also hailed U.S. District Judge David Carters decision to throw out a challenge to Proposition 8, California's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, had claimed that both Prop. 8 and the federal DOMA violate the U.S. Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause.
The two men filed the suit in December 2008 five months after they obtained a marriage license in California during the short period same-sex marriage was legal last year.
In his ruling Thursday, Carter said California is no longer an appropriate target in the DOMA case because the gay couple who brought it got married in California before voters approved Prop. 8 in the last election.
Also, because the California State Supreme Court recently held that such marriages would remain intact, they had no "injury" or standing to challenge the measure, the judge ruled.
"The twice-expressed will of the people of California for traditional marriage is under assault from many lawsuits, but our recent string of victories in both state and federal courts is very gratifying," commented Andrew Pugno, chief legal counsel for ProtectMarriage.com.
"ProtectMarriage.com will continue to fight for marriage and fight to defend the will of the people, no matter what course and no matter what legal theory they conjure up," Pugno added.
While California will be removed as a defendant to the DOMA lawsuit, the U.S. government remains a defendant.
Portions of the case will be heard in August with the next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 3.
The U.S. Department of Justice is arguing to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents the U.S. government from recognizing same-sex marriages.
maybe there is some gleam of hope for California? at least we got this one straight
You mean a Kalifornia judge actually followed the law and the will of the people? Shouldn’t he get a plaque, a medal or something!
maybe there is some gleam of hope for California? at least we got this one straight.
now all you Conservative Moral Value residents of California.
Remember the one non profit organization that NEVER waivered, THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA. Please send donations. The council I am working in is about to close their doors. We need your support now more than ever
hmmmm....David Carter. Same David Carter to hear the Keyes BC case?
It took long enough!
It’s almost as if the VOTE doesn’t matter.
I fear that will not be true in our ELECTIONS.
When President Clinton signed DOMA that made it settled law throughout the land IMHO just as abortion is now considered settled law.
Is this the suit where Ted Olson was serving as plaintiff’s counsel? Somehow I doubt it.
He Smelt alright ...
I hope Judge Carter rules BO is not a Natural Citizen.
Arthur Smelt Christopher’s Hammer?
Ya can’t make this stuff up, folks! :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.