Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Tosses Prop. 8 Challenge, OKs Removal of Calif. from DOMA Suit
Christian Post ^ | 7/17/2009 | Lawrence D. Jones

Posted on 07/18/2009 8:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Traditional marriage advocates on Friday lauded the order of a federal judge to remove the state of California as a defendant in a lawsuit challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

They also hailed U.S. District Judge David Carter’s decision to throw out a challenge to Proposition 8, California's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, had claimed that both Prop. 8 and the federal DOMA violate the U.S. Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause.

The two men filed the suit in December 2008 – five months after they obtained a marriage license in California during the short period same-sex marriage was legal last year.

In his ruling Thursday, Carter said California is no longer an appropriate target in the DOMA case because the gay couple who brought it got married in California before voters approved Prop. 8 in the last election.

Also, because the California State Supreme Court recently held that such marriages would remain intact, they had no "injury" or standing to challenge the measure, the judge ruled.

"The twice-expressed will of the people of California for traditional marriage is under assault from many lawsuits, but our recent string of victories in both state and federal courts is very gratifying," commented Andrew Pugno, chief legal counsel for ProtectMarriage.com.

"ProtectMarriage.com will continue to fight for marriage and fight to defend the will of the people, no matter what course and no matter what legal theory they conjure up," Pugno added.

While California will be removed as a defendant to the DOMA lawsuit, the U.S. government remains a defendant.

Portions of the case will be heard in August with the next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 3.

The U.S. Department of Justice is arguing to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents the U.S. government from recognizing same-sex marriages.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: california; doma; gaymarriage; marriage

1 posted on 07/18/2009 8:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

maybe there is some gleam of hope for California? at least we got this one straight


2 posted on 07/18/2009 8:56:10 AM PDT by television is just wrong (one bad ass mistake America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You mean a Kalifornia judge actually followed the law and the will of the people? Shouldn’t he get a plaque, a medal or something!


3 posted on 07/18/2009 8:57:08 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

maybe there is some gleam of hope for California? at least we got this one straight.

now all you Conservative Moral Value residents of California.

Remember the one non profit organization that NEVER waivered, THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA. Please send donations. The council I am working in is about to close their doors. We need your support now more than ever


4 posted on 07/18/2009 8:58:06 AM PDT by television is just wrong (one bad ass mistake America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

hmmmm....David Carter. Same David Carter to hear the Keyes BC case?


5 posted on 07/18/2009 9:05:56 AM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

It took long enough!

It’s almost as if the VOTE doesn’t matter.

I fear that will not be true in our ELECTIONS.


6 posted on 07/18/2009 9:07:31 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01

When President Clinton signed DOMA that made it settled law throughout the land IMHO just as abortion is now considered settled law.


7 posted on 07/18/2009 9:08:20 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is this the suit where Ted Olson was serving as plaintiff’s counsel? Somehow I doubt it.


8 posted on 07/18/2009 9:09:34 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He Smelt alright ...


9 posted on 07/18/2009 9:51:19 AM PDT by clamper1797 (A KGB agent couldn't do a better job as president ... Clamper 1797 proud racist since Nov 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

I hope Judge Carter rules BO is not a Natural Citizen.


10 posted on 07/18/2009 10:59:17 AM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Arthur Smelt Christopher’s Hammer?

Ya can’t make this stuff up, folks! :-)


11 posted on 07/18/2009 11:59:43 AM PDT by TrueKnightGalahad (When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson