[Zakeet]

The Episcopal Church: Laying the groundwork for future moves.

[TexasFreeper2009]

I dont understand how any Christian denomination could condone homosexuality.

Few things are more clear in the bible than that homosexuality is immoral, unnatural, and blatantly sinful behavior regarded as an abomination by god.

There are a lot of things that can be interrupted many different ways from reading the bible, but homosexuality is not one of them.

[LibertarianLiz]

Meanwhile, gay rights advocates said this week's victories lay the groundwork for future moves.

It is never enough. No matter what you do to appease these people (or any grievance group), it is never enough.

[RegulatorCountry]

Gay unions are perfectly compatible with evolution.

[MarineBrat]

Why these jackwads pretend to be Christian is beyond me.

[Jeff Chandler]

Do they intend to replace chrism with Preparation H?

[SECURE AMERICA]

Episcopal Church officials voted yesterday to allow bishops the latitude to bless same-sex unions —

Another group that has fallen of the path to the Kingdom..

[grey_whiskers]

Can anyone do Photoshop to put a big scarlet "L" on each of their foreheads?

Cheers!

[shankbear]

Didn’t they fudge a bit, packing all of this into an edict from a so-called church?

[twister881]

""These actions could show other denominations that progress can be made without destroying the church," said Harry Knox, religion and faith director at the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights group.".

Uh, I've got news for you, "Miss" Knox. The Episcopal Church already has been torn apart and is dying off rapidly. Soon only a few thousand secular leftists and a bunch of building will remain.

[highlander_UW]

Their signs are evasive in that they list what they’re really after last...that is, they want to force Americans to respect homosexuality. Sorry, won’t respect sin, rather it’s homosexuality, theft, murder lies or anything else and no amount of laws is going to change that. And the whole argument is fallacious anyway...there is NO right to marriage. A heterosexual person can’t marry someone of the same sex, just as a homosexual person can’t...no difference in treatment under the law. And if the return argument is that heterosexuals can marry who they want that is also false. They can not marry an under age person, they can not marry a close relative etc. So the entire “rights” argument is specious.