Skip to comments.
If we could get millions of Americans to march on Washington, what would we do?
Prior thread ^
| July 18, 2009
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 07/18/2009 11:30:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Edited on 07/18/2009 11:48:33 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 821-840 next last
To: CRBDeuce
Reflect a little more please.
521
posted on
07/19/2009 10:01:22 AM PDT
by
Miztiki
To: Parawan
In the last analysis, the Constitution is a contract between three parties, the citizens, the states, and the federal establishment. The latter is guilty of a massive breach of contract, and the grievances of the remaining two parties must be redressed in some manner.Bears repeating.
To: Alter Kaker
by force or violenceso what you're saying is that since Obama is not using force or violence to destroy our Constitutional Republic that he should NOT go to jail for 5 years?
523
posted on
07/19/2009 10:05:07 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: ICCtheWay
A Throng of Millions cannot be stopped - that is the SECRET... if a million people do not want to be moved - they cannot be.. Your logical assessment of the DC March scenario is entirely correct, and is all the more reason that we need at least one million angry patriots to show up in DC on 9/12.
We won't even have to bear arms to effect the sort of changes that Jim Rob prescribes in his post, if enough Americans arrive at the seat of federal power and demand it.
If we want to compel a peaceful restoration of our constitutional form of government, then we've got to overwhelm DC with numbers, and that means one million plus protesters.
Failing this, there will be no other way to stop the destruction of our beloved country, but to execute our right to do so under the 2nd Amendment.
I'm pretty sure that most of us would prefer to go with the first option, now, while we still can.
524
posted on
07/19/2009 10:08:51 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Jim Robinson
How can restoring legal constitutional government be called rebellion?It can not! But it does need a name lest the doubters call it rebellion! Your Constitution Restoration Convention has a nice ring to it! But I'll go with any name you give it.
525
posted on
07/19/2009 10:20:39 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Jim Robinson
the education system is as broken as government, but you’re right. it need not be fixed in this thread.
526
posted on
07/19/2009 10:30:50 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
I’m with you. Pick a date and make sure there is enough time to get the message out. Everyone changes their W4’s so that you end up with zero federal and state withholding. But it has to be done at the same time.
To: Jim Robinson
528
posted on
07/19/2009 10:35:18 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(People who do things are people that get things done.)
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
I think it’d be cool if we all got tattoos.
529
posted on
07/19/2009 10:39:22 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: hedgetrimmer
sample legislation This Congress has let us sample their legislation enough! (we've read some of it, they have not!). The potential destruction of their remaining legislation is the 'trigger' that should invoke 'overthrow of government' lawsuits for our Constitutional Republic! Alternatively, JimRob's strategy is worth all our consideration and support.
530
posted on
07/19/2009 10:43:11 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Jim Robinson
531
posted on
07/19/2009 10:48:03 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(If there were any honest politicians we'd all be rich)
To: randomhero97
more than half the uniforms will be on our side...
532
posted on
07/19/2009 10:49:00 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Jim Robinson
As it is, the states and the people are all headed for bankruptcy forced upon us by Marxist fools, and our beloved country is headed for total collapse. Yes, and the fools who said the USSR would never collapse under its own weight are the very same fools and useful idiots pushing now for the very same Marxist programs and policies that brought that great Marxist totalitarian state and world superpower down. Marxism always leads to the same place. Even for great superpowers. hopefully I'm not the only one who thinks this is worth repeating, and repeating often. You've stated the vision that must be understood by all, and yet is denied by most in this country. Must go with the global warming gene.
533
posted on
07/19/2009 10:52:26 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: stockpirate
That is a valid concern, as we are currently led by a banana republic leader wanabee. friend of Chavez and Castro, pro-communist. So yep, his hurry up and push their buttons mentallity is clearly pointing that direction. Our one saving grace is the simple fact that just because he gives the order, doesn’t mean that it is a lawful order.
534
posted on
07/19/2009 10:56:51 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: usconservative
Enough is enough. I don't know how old you are but I'm 46. My sons are 10 and 12 years old. Either we have this revolution NOW and clean up the mess that infests Washington DC, or my sons (and maybe yours) will have to do it because we were COWARDS at this point in history and wouldn't do the job. Yep...it's your generation and the one before you gotta gitter done. The generations after you were the ones who voted for the con.
535
posted on
07/19/2009 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Mr. Silverback
The hippie scumbags all got elected....
536
posted on
07/19/2009 11:06:04 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Jim Robinson
we must have a CINC on day one.definitely.
537
posted on
07/19/2009 11:08:35 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Winstons Julia
the ubiquitous cry at tea parties has been less government.
538
posted on
07/19/2009 11:14:06 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: Jim Robinson
Frm a NEW Party
BIG Jim Thompson's People Party!
To: central_va
while it may eventually evolve to that (we know we’re not a majority yet), let’s stick with the Stars & Stripes and Gadsen for now!
540
posted on
07/19/2009 11:18:38 AM PDT
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 821-840 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson