Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We are now so spineless, I will never see a man walk on Mars
Telegraph ^ | 19 Jul 2009 | Boris Johnson

Posted on 07/20/2009 8:09:20 AM PDT by skimbell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: kittymyrib
Actually, the USA is worse than broke. If private enterprise can’t finance space exploration, the government certainly can’t fund it.

Hm. Well, no. The economics of space exploration in general are not at all interesting to private enterprise.

Private enterprise is built on the idea that investors will get a reasonable return on their investment within a reasonable time.

There are sectors of the space business where the time and profit factors are positive: Communucations satellites are an obvious example and, increasingly, so is space-based imaging.

But space exploration on the "going to Mars" model has absolutely no profit potential over a 10-year time span, and probably not even over a 50-100 year time span.

It requires far too much infrastructure, and for manned space that sort of thing is intrinsically extremely costly.

And once you get to Mars.... what is there at Mars that could turn a profit? What could be done or gotten there that cannot be done or gotten more cheaply here?

The simple economic truth is that private enterprise is not going to be at the forefront of solar system space exploration until some entity that is not profit-driven provides the necessary infrastructure. What that means, of course, is that "government" of some sort will have to build it.

21 posted on 07/20/2009 8:43:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Wishful thinking. The United States will not return to the Moon for at least 35-50 years, if ever. We will not go to Mars. Ever

This is assuming democrats complete their attempt at absolute control of the United States and rename us the United Socialist States of Amerika.


22 posted on 07/20/2009 8:44:36 AM PDT by Crazieman (Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shineon
"Space is one cold muthaf**ka"

That'll probably be Obama's justification for canceling our manned spaceflight program.

23 posted on 07/20/2009 8:45:26 AM PDT by thecabal (Hey Obama, when you gonna start sharin' the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
If we had an international treaty stating that extraplanetary land and resources can be claimed by any private person or company, or country for that matter, who personally claims and stakes the territory, we’d create free market incentives to go to mars and other places. As it stands, the treaties don’t allow this.

Look at reality, though. What private company or consortium is going to spend tens of billions, with no reasonable expectations for a bunch of useless land on Mars, for which there is no reasonable expectation for a "timely" (i.e., under 50 years) return on investment?

24 posted on 07/20/2009 8:46:37 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

There is no way on Earth, that we could engineer ourselves out of a paper bag, let alone go back to the moon or Mars. There are so many rules, regulations, red tape, political payoffs, environment impact, corruption by everyone involved, bribes, cost cutting, that it is impossible to even build a bridge across a creak, let alone go to Mars! American engineering was once the best in the world. But now, to even find engineers who know basic math is a major challenge. And, even if you found them, you couldn’t hire any of them because it wouldn’t be fair to the minority engineer with a D average puffed into an A. Face it, we are not going to be building anything more than more low income housing for the next 100 years.


25 posted on 07/20/2009 8:55:02 AM PDT by hot4plasma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
Wishful thinking. The United States will not return to the Moon for at least 35-50 years, if ever. We will not go to Mars. Ever

Forever is a long time. And I did say that a Cold War-like competition with China was the ONLY way that I could foresee us going to Mars. Right now I don't see the competition with China developing along the same lines. The Chinese seem to be much more "indirect" than the Soviets were, so we are being boiled like the proverbial frog.

26 posted on 07/20/2009 8:55:23 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
There are many in our government, including Republicrats, that I’d like to see walking on Mars, but without a return ticket.

Dittos, except I wouldn't even give them a spacesuit.

27 posted on 07/20/2009 8:57:35 AM PDT by MarkeyD (OBAMA. Chains we can believe in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Very good post. I agree with you 100%.


28 posted on 07/20/2009 9:09:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
Why go to Mars? Why go to the Moon? Well, to find out if there's something there worth bringing back. As long as that part is prohibited by Luddites convinced that humanity is a sort of planetary plague, it isn't going to happen.

The Voyages of Discovery in the New World weren't done by people with a selfless interest in science, they were done by people looking to get rich, and only later to raise families exempt from old oppressions. We marvel today at the willingness of people to coop themselves and their families up in cramped, dangerous wooden ships and launch themselves over the vastness of the ocean in order to settle the New World. A lot of them didn't make it.

Unfortunately it isn't particularly difficult to imagine what conditions a similar group of people would be fleeing on the Earth. We're creating them now in the nanny state socialist "paradises" from which the only escape may well be the sort of roll of the dice that landed the Mayflower on a far shore. Heinlein certainly thought that would be the motivating factor. He was an optimist.

29 posted on 07/20/2009 9:15:08 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

40 years ago I wanted to believe that even I would be able to walk on Mars and/or the Moon before I was 60 or 70.

Maybe there is some explanation other than our astronauts (NASA) were warned by Aliens working on the Moon not to return to “their”base.

I can think of no other logical explanation as to why we have not returned and have nothing scheduled anytime in the near future then the Alien warning theory.


30 posted on 07/20/2009 9:18:32 AM PDT by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

If there were human colonies on other moons/planets, then there really couldn’t be one big, happy global government, could there????????


31 posted on 07/20/2009 9:33:10 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jongaltsr

32 posted on 07/20/2009 9:38:26 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jongaltsr

If there were human colonies on other moons/planets, then there really couldn’t be one big, happy global government, could there????????


33 posted on 07/20/2009 10:01:09 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
The Pussification of the world continues...

Killing a “man to Mars” project is good news to me.
Big space boondoggles eat up all the funds that could go to more important smaller scientific projects on earth.
That money could be better spent on research for solving the energy crisis. Or the solution to essential materials crisis. Finding a cancer cure. Exploring the ocean floor. Desalination and moving water to our deserts.
It is unfortunate that the public is so illiterate in science that the only scientific achievement that can capture their imagination is a useless journey to Mars.
34 posted on 07/20/2009 10:05:37 AM PDT by broncobilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

NASA is so engulfed in political social engineering that man would probably be transgendered, anyway.


35 posted on 07/20/2009 10:07:27 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

We might never get to Mars, but our national debt will get there and back in the next fiscal year.


36 posted on 07/20/2009 10:10:17 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

We might never get to Mars, but our national debt will get there and back in the next fiscal year.


37 posted on 07/20/2009 10:10:18 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Good points, and for years I thought the space race was J F’n Ks attempt to divert attention from growing racial problems in America.
The riots in 1967 showed that it didn’t work.
The Great Society spending of 1968 showed that folks could be bought off, at least for a while.
And now, our cities are in a slow motion riot 24/7.


38 posted on 07/20/2009 10:18:37 AM PDT by ASOC (Who is that fat lady? And why is she singing???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I’m not sure I agree. I can’t think of a business model that would work either. But I didn’t think up the personal computer and MS Windows either. Take off the shackles and the market will find a way. Maybe some uber billionaire decides to spend 20 Billion to put himself on Mars, and claims a billion acres of land (about 3%). That’s only $20 an acre. And he get’s first choice. That’s way cheaper than our acquisition of Alaska in today’s dollars. Maybe he gets patents on key technologies developed in just getting there that find other uses for a more immediate return. Or he charges $10 per hit from video from the surface. I’m just saying, someone could find a reason to do it.


39 posted on 07/20/2009 12:37:22 PM PDT by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

Doesn’t help that this generation coming up, (at least in my country) may as well be retarded. Yes, they’re that stupid, and that lazy. Not an imagination amongst them.


40 posted on 08/04/2009 12:43:45 PM PDT by Catholic Canadian ( I love Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson