Skip to comments.
Crazy Russian Sukhoi Su-35 Pilot Ejects For a Hollywood Movie at Mach 2
Gizmodo ^
| Mon Jul 27 2009, 30,145 views
| Jesus Diaz
Posted on 07/27/2009 12:51:02 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: OpeEdMunkey
Crazy Ivan or not, pit a SU35-UB against a F-22 Raptor. Wonder who would have the edge? I'm bettin' on the F-22. Especially if the Sukhoi pilot has bailed out. (Russian accent) NYET! Sukhoi 35-UB is BEST when pilot bailed out. Makes MORE micemeat out of F-22 crapinski.
61
posted on
07/27/2009 1:59:00 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("If they taxed condoms and toilet paper, they'd have us coming and going." - Lazamataz, 2002)
To: Blueflag
um ... didnt happen at MACH 2, trust me. Totally correct.
Considering the flame and smoke patterns, that is an about 200-250 knot ejection.
62
posted on
07/27/2009 2:00:14 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
("Ok, so I screwed up... again. I'm 65. What are they going to do, send me back to Vietnam again?)
To: Texas resident
Heheh...more like “Hold muh shot of vodka...”
63
posted on
07/27/2009 2:02:16 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Everyone thinks they’re an expert here. I wonder if anyone can tell me the speed of an ejection seat from a stationary plane?
64
posted on
07/27/2009 2:05:36 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: mnehring
At 1400 mph, the plane would move two feet during a 1/1000 second exposure. That image is far too sharp for anything moving at that speed.
65
posted on
07/27/2009 2:19:32 PM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
To: Texas resident
66
posted on
07/27/2009 2:26:57 PM PDT
by
hawkboy
To: OpeEdMunkey
I would bet on the F-22 also, and feel pretty safe about it.
67
posted on
07/27/2009 2:34:56 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
To: saganite
Cheetah
I’ve been told that there is nothing that will out maneuver and F-22.
68
posted on
07/27/2009 2:37:00 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
To: hawkboy
He came from the russian sattelite of redneckistan.
69
posted on
07/27/2009 2:42:10 PM PDT
by
Texas resident
( Boys and Girls, it's us against them.)
To: mamelukesabre
http://www.ejectionsite.com/
Try that site.
I didn’t see a maximum velocity mentioned; probably because that’d depend on the weight of the pilot, but there are numbers for the G-forces imposed. Interesting site, nonetheless.
70
posted on
07/27/2009 2:48:27 PM PDT
by
HKMk23
(1335)
To: SkyDancer
go to the post you want pulled, and the “report abuse” link will be almost directly under your name.
71
posted on
07/27/2009 3:40:41 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(I am John Galt...)
To: Texas Fossil
Well, in my example the F-22 is the Lion. The Cheetah has absolutely no chance in a fight except to run. That’s what I meant anyway. Guess it wasn’t a very good analogy!
72
posted on
07/27/2009 3:41:10 PM PDT
by
saganite
(What would Sully do?)
To: So Cal Rocket
This is all that is there:
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies
73
posted on
07/27/2009 3:51:32 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: SkyDancer
To: OpeEdMunkey
That would be the canopy...
75
posted on
07/27/2009 4:04:49 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
To: saganite
To: Admin Moderator
77
posted on
07/27/2009 4:06:04 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: saganite
I understood the analogy but was thinking in terms of survival. The Cheetah could outrun the Lion every time. Kill ability is another thing.
There are a lot of problems with the F-22 from what I have heard, but agility is not one of them.
Cost, maintenance, support, and more.
BUT when in the air, nothing will out maneuver it. In a dogfight it is lethal.
78
posted on
07/27/2009 4:11:30 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
To: HKMk23
150g/sec with a max of 14g. I figure the seat reaches a minimum of 12.8m/s when ejected from a stationary plane. I’m approximating to avoid doing any calculus. But it might be up to double that depending on how long the rocket fires after reaching the max of 14g.
12.8 x 3.28ft/m x 1mi/5280ft x 60^2 = about 300mph.
That’s not as fast as I thought.
79
posted on
07/27/2009 4:18:10 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Texas Fossil
There was an excellent thread here a few days ago about the so called mx problems with the F-22. Mostly teething problems you get with any new fighter. As for it’s lethality, it’s unmatched. Think P-51 going up against any WWI fighter. Agility is superior but that’s not really it’s strong suit. I’ve talked to F-15 pilots who have faced it in exercises. They never see it coming. First thing they know about it is when the F-22 pilot starts calling shots on them. Usually it runs: F-22 kills everything flying. Everything flying dies.
80
posted on
07/27/2009 4:19:24 PM PDT
by
saganite
(What would Sully do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson