Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Fill-in Host Donny Deutsch: Palin 'First Woman in Power that has Sexual Appeal'
NewsBusters ^ | July 27, 2009 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 07/27/2009 2:44:55 PM PDT by Rufus2007

It's the kind of astute analysis you'd expect from MSNBC - the place for the politics. CNBC regular and MSNBC fill-in anchor Donny Deutsch solved the mystery behind the media's fascination with former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

According to the former advertising executive, it has nothing to do with her stance on several hot-button issues - an advocate of gun rights, a pro-life stance on abortion, pro-exploration and drilling for oil and concerned about the fiscal policies of President Barack Obama. Instead, he contended, it is her sexual appeal that held the media's attention - and not just from a male perspective, but a female perspective as well.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: donnydeutsch; palin; pds; sexuality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Rufus2007

Palin may be the first hottie in power but she won’t be the last....that’s the coming trend...check out the women anchors on FOX...smart women that are hot get ahead...the prom queens win in the end.


21 posted on 07/27/2009 2:57:04 PM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Why is it that everything with libs have to do with sex. Wanting to have sex with her, being aroused by her. They are sick perverts. But I guess since all of the liberal women on their side look like rodents I can understand their frustration. Imagine having to wake up in the morning looking at Nancy Pelosi. Nuff said


22 posted on 07/27/2009 2:57:47 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Hehe, like Janeane Garofalo, who has all the charm and fashion sense of a heroin addict.


23 posted on 07/27/2009 2:59:20 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

BS!

I listen to her words, and relate to her philosophy and vision. I don’t vote on the basis of eye candy.


24 posted on 07/27/2009 2:59:25 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

The whole world is shallow...Even the Bible says in the End Days people will be lovers of themselves rather than GOD.

If you judge Palin’s looks, then she is brought down to a level that makes her no more relevant than any other women that is measured by her looks....


25 posted on 07/27/2009 3:08:49 PM PDT by TaraP (Unless we stand for something, we will fall for everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
"We don’t have to feel that we must beg an allowance from Washington – except to beg the allowance to be self-determined.

Sarah, darling... I love you to bits, but... I'm not begging those clowns in Washington for what is already mine. They work for me. Not the other way around...

26 posted on 07/27/2009 3:09:44 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
The Left is terrified of Palin because she resonates with American women. Thus... the continued trashing.
27 posted on 07/27/2009 3:11:29 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
BINGO! Sexy, teabagging, etc. The sexual revolution of the 1960s defined women as sex toys. Naked and hot. But not intellectual. The Left uses women as playthings. And... they must love it because they vote for Leftist candidates in droves....
28 posted on 07/27/2009 3:13:37 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

You said: Our women are good looking because they are human...

What does this mean?

Hallie Berry, Faith Hill, Monica Bellucci are beautiful liberal women....Liberal, Conservative,Democrat or Republican all have there share of physically beautiful women..So what?

When women are judged on the content of their character, maybe then women will have made a dent in society....

Personally my grandmother was poor, she was fat and did not have money to fix her teeth, yet she raised 4 Children by herself during the depression (one being my mother) and she gave her kids all the love and guidance they could want, she started her own buisness when her kids grew up, she was loved by men and women who wanted to be her friend, she was the best Grandma to her 10 grandchildren until she died and she was a woman that made a wonderful impact on everyone’s life she touched....

I only wish women today could know this kind of admiration and respect for a woman in there own life..


29 posted on 07/27/2009 3:20:22 PM PDT by TaraP (Unless we stand for something, we will fall for everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

What liberal women hate most about Palin isn’t how intelligent she is, or how well she handles her family and career together.

It’s having to listen to their boyfriends commenting about how hot Sarah is!

;^)


30 posted on 07/27/2009 3:24:16 PM PDT by airborne (Congratulations to the Stanley Cup Champions! PITTSBURGH PENGUINS RULE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

The sexual revolution of the 1960s defined women as sex toys. Naked and hot..NO they didn’t...

Women defined themselves as wanting to be equal with men, they wanted to be free to have sex with whom they wanted, burning of the bras, free love....It was the 80’s that started this overly sexualized society that has spiraled out of control today....


31 posted on 07/27/2009 3:26:30 PM PDT by TaraP (Unless we stand for something, we will fall for everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
You said: Our women are good looking because they are human... What does this mean?

It means beauty is based on love. Like in the Lord of the Rings. The ring made everyone ugly on the outside because it made them ugly on the inside. It brought sinful human nature to the fore, and that is ugly.

Liberalism is a religion of hate and women who feast at that banquet long enough become ugly inside and it manifests itself on the outside. Your grandmother was beautiful because she was loving and beautiful on the inside and that love was reflected on the outside, no matter how she looked physically.

32 posted on 07/27/2009 3:27:50 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Sorry, sweetie. I was there in the 1960s and the Left intentionally turned women into sex toys for the pleasure of party bosses. Women were and are toys in the communist party. It was fun and everyone went along for the ride. If you are referencing the 1980s, you missed the show. You are the result of these efforts. A few women went along for the ride in the 1960s because it was “radical.” Most were normal. By the 1980s, the task was accomplished and women were/are as easy as candy...
33 posted on 07/27/2009 3:31:14 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: airborne

It’s having to listen to their boyfriends commenting about how hot Sarah is!

AGAIN:
This makes no sense...So watching the Victoria Secret Runway show, or watching Megan Fox on Transformers is not going to trigger jealousy in these liberal girlfriends when it comes to their boyfriends?

This just sounds highly immature to me....Sarah should be measured on the content of her values and her strengths, if she isn’t, then I guess she will be measured agaisnt her looks which could fail, with the next prettier or younger face that comes around...


34 posted on 07/27/2009 3:33:18 PM PDT by TaraP (Unless we stand for something, we will fall for everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

For me (and I suspect most Palin supporters) it is all about her no-mincing words approach to the issues and her conservative values. Period.


35 posted on 07/27/2009 3:34:20 PM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

Okay now I understand...I would definetly agree with you....


36 posted on 07/27/2009 3:34:56 PM PDT by TaraP (Unless we stand for something, we will fall for everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Deutch is a failed TV program host.

Loser.


37 posted on 07/27/2009 3:37:18 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
BS! I listen to her words, and relate to her philosophy and vision. I don’t vote on the basis of eye candy.

That's got nothing to do with what I said, and your quickness to deny the very obvious and the anger of your response does you no favors.

38 posted on 07/27/2009 3:37:37 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
If she looked like Pelosi, would she be as popular/hated?

Pelosi looks like that because she has been full of bitterness and hatred for decades.

What you are on the inside manifests it's self in the physical appearance.

Sarah Palin's outward appearance reflects her inner self: not being bitter and full of hate, but being a concerned loving person.

Pelosi's features are such that she could be a real beautiful person on the outside if she was not bitter and hateful on the inside.

So your answer is yes and no.

39 posted on 07/27/2009 3:49:15 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sir Clancelot
Oh Rachel Maddow, yeah he is pretty cute. He looks a little like a gym teacher I once had, actually. Strange.
40 posted on 07/27/2009 3:51:55 PM PDT by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson