Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog
"Although in a way I can understand why, whoever put John B. Hood in charge of the Confederate forces made a grave error."

There was a brief correspondence between Hood and Sherman over the period of a few days prior to Sherman's moving on the city...it's pretty fascinating. In a nutshell, Sherman offered to assist in the evacuation of civilians and cautioned Hood against locating his guns and fighting positions in and among civilians.

Can't say he wasn't warned.

A sympathetic (post-Atlanta) anecdote regarding Sherman can be found at General Sherman's Georgia Romance.

12 posted on 07/27/2009 3:37:41 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack
General Sherman was actually much admired in the South in the years after the War.

Mostly because he believed in "total war, and total peace," as he put it himself, and did not support the persecution of the South that took place during Reconstruction under the Radicals.

As a matter of fact, he was an honored guest at many Confederate Veterans Camps all across the South, including the Eufaula AL Camp, of which my gg grandfather was commander at the time.

Probably he wouldn't have been as well received in Atlanta, but the real hatred of Sherman didn't start until he and the rest of the participants in the WBTS were dead.

21 posted on 07/27/2009 3:57:56 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson