Replies

”So will you go on record saying that we cannot rule out Evolution scientifically?”

Evolution can be falsified simply find fossil of a pre-cambrian rabbit, or a Clovis point embedded in a Velociraptor fossil.

You cannot disprove “God did it” that is why Intelligent Design/Creationism/ cdesign proponentsists are not science.

“Evolution and Biology are two completely different things.”

“During an on-line colloquy about science policy in the Bush administration conducted by The Chronicle of Higher Education on March 5, John H. Marburger III, director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, was asked about the Bush administration’s scientific credibility in light of the president’s reported skepticism about evolution. He replied, “Evolution is a cornerstone of modern biology,” adding, “Much of the work supported by the National Institutes of Health depends heavily on the concepts of evolution. President Bush has supported the largest increases in the NIH budget in history.”

So again you are shown to be incorrect, I will however give a little credit for at least attempting to set up a straw man to knock down.

There is currently not scientific a Theory for Intelligent Design/Creationism/ cdesign proponentsists since there is zero scientific evidence to support it.

And yes your statements do show that you have a very poor understanding of science.
This is stuff that one would normally learn at the high school level.

"Evolution can be falsified simply find fossil of a pre-cambrian rabbit, or a Clovis point embedded in a Velociraptor fossil. You cannot disprove “God did it” that is why Intelligent Design/Creationism/ cdesign proponentsists are not science."

Creation can be falsified scientifically in theory, I said it cannot be ruled out because there is no scientific evidence to rule it out. To rule it out is to be philosophical not scientific. To falsify creation using science a scientist must: generate matter from nothing randomly, collide particles together and form an intelligent system, produce new species by breeding an existing species over time in a natural setting. If any of those experiments were true, then it would hurt the theory of Creation and could even eliminated it from science altogether legitimately not by the force of judges in a courtroom.

Why did you quote an Evolutionist saying, “Evolution is a cornerstone of modern biology,”. Of course he thinks that, he's an Evolutionist. Do really think that is any kind of evidence whatsoever? And you call me unscientific?

"So again you are shown to be incorrect, I will however give a little credit for at least attempting to set up a straw man to knock down."

Great, it only took a few posts and you are already saying straw man. You are most certainly an Evolutionist. There is no straw man in my argument, you just used a quote from an Evolutionist to prove that Evolution is the cornerstone of Biology. That is a complete joke.

"And yes your statements do show that you have a very poor understanding of science. This is stuff that one would normally learn at the high school level."

You have disproved nothing I have said. Biology studies the origin of species and Creation is a legitimate theory that can be dis proven with testing. You don't like that idea because you know that all the tests would fail and prove Creation as the proper theory on the origin of all species until scientific evidence can prove otherwise. That is the very definition of science. Cling to your philosophical thinking, but know that it is not the thought process of a true scientist. It is simply a thought of a hopeful philosopher with a head full of dreams and heart full faith in Evolution.