Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Terpfen

“I’m 99% sure you’re confusing what Opera complained about with the popular misconception of what the Clinton DoJ went after Microsoft for.”

That’s not how I remember it, but I will check on that.


55 posted on 07/29/2009 3:25:56 PM PDT by asformeandformyhouse (I've been listening to a lot of rap music lately. Mostly at red lights and stop signs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: asformeandformyhouse

Just to be clear:

The Clinton DoJ alleged that Microsoft was a monopoly which abused said monopoly on the operating system market to threaten OEMs that shipped computers with Netscape pre-loaded. In this particular instance, Microsoft was charging OEMs a higher price for Windows licenses if they shipped Netscape, and gave them a discount if they only shipped with Internet Explorer.

Opera alleged that the mere inclusion of Internet Explorer with Windows is anticompetitive and illegal, as opposed to Microsoft using its leverage in the operating system market to exclude competition in the web browser market.

These are separate and wildly different cases, and people generally misunderstand and misremember the Clinton DoJ’s case against Microsoft as being some kind of indictment of the inclusion of Internet Explorer with Windows. It was not.


57 posted on 07/29/2009 3:36:38 PM PDT by Terpfen (FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson