Posted on 07/28/2009 10:22:30 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
In 2005, when I was working as a speechwriter in the South African parliament, a far-left faction of the ruling African National Congress spun a yarn that accused the leader of the opposition, the intelligence minister, and the Mossad of colluding to frame Jacob Zuma, the faction's chosen presidential candidate.
Intelligence agents loyal to Zuma bugged the opposition's parliamentary offices and produced a bogus document that they claimed was a transcript of Internet chats between Zuma's supposed opponents.
It was all nonsense, but the conspiracy theory galvanized Zuma's supporters, who soon pushed him to the top of the ruling party and the country, trampling the rule of law in the process.
Here in the United States, the conspiracy theory that alleges that President Barack Obama faked his American birth is likewise troubling. Rather than propelling Republicans to power, however, the "Birther" theory is being used by Democrats and their media allies to isolate and undermine the opposition.
Though some of the wonderful "facts" people have been led to believe about Obama are demonstrably untrue (he is still often referred to, for example, as a former "law professor"), the fact of his American birth is not one of them.
The test is not simply whether there are doubts, but whether those doubts are reasonable. That is a test the Birther theory failed long ago. Perhaps its proponents ought to have had their day in court, but that probably would not have helped their cause, nor convinced the most determined among them to abandon it.
The media has cast Birtherism as a conservative phenomenon -- and it is fast spreading among conservative activists -- but it was originally a Democrat obsession. The most prominent Birther, Philip J. Berg, is a Democrat who backed Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primary. Other rumors, such as the infamous and non-existent Michelle Obama "‘whitey' tape," were also weapons in the Democrats' internal struggle.
In the same vein, left-wing pundits claim the Birther thesis reveals latent racism in the Republican Party. But it was the Democrats, not the Republicans, who made race an issue in the 2008 campaign. From the Obama campaign's charges that Hillary Clinton was the Senator from Punjab, to the Clinton campaign's leaking of a photo of Obama in Somali garb, right up through Bill Clinton's "fairy tale" comment and the whole Jeremiah Wright affair, it was the left that remained obsessed with race and identity politics.
The Birther theory is likewise an artifact of left-wing squabbles. Conservatives who are tempted by the Birther theory should ask themselves why the mainstream media is now so interested in the story when they were so reluctant to give any attention to the allegations during the 2008 campaign (when, if true, they might have made a difference).
It's not because there is any fresh evidence to support the Birther thesis, but because the Birther thesis has again become politically useful to the left.
Since Obama took office in January, his supporters have sought to entrench his power by creating controversy around one conservative after another. The first target was Rush Limbaugh, whom Obama himself singled out. Then they revived the smear campaign against Sarah Palin. The Birther controversy is the latest incarnation of this strategy, which aims to taint all Republicans by association with a discredited libel.
And too many conservatives have been eager to take the bait.
There are two reasons why so many find the Birther theory compelling. One is the opaqueness of Obama himself. There is much about our president we still do not know.
For example, throughout 2008 the media showed little interest in Obama's connections to the underworld of Chicago politics, regarding Hillary Clinton's references to fraudster "slumlord" Tony Rezko as mere fear-mongering. When the Blagojevich scandal exploded in December 2008, many journalists were quick to accept Obama's assurances of innocent naïveté.
Other details about the president's past remain hidden or suppressed. Obama has never, for example, provided a convincing explanation of why he disposed of his papers from the Illinois State Senate, or how he managed to lose the thesis he wrote at Columbia. He sometimes fibs about essential details of his personal life -- such as where he met his wife -- and offers inauthentic projections of empathy with ordinary folk, such as references to arugula or memories of "Cominskey Field."
The Obama team also has a habit of releasing information in cryptic drips and drabs, and Friday-afternoon document drops. During the campaign, he suddenly revealed that he had taken a trip to Pakistan in 1981 -- a voyage he had not alluded to in either of his two memoirs -- and his staff only belatedly acknowledged his authorship of an unsigned Harvard Law Review article on abortion.
The candidate who promised transparency has been anything but transparent, feeding the suspicion that drives the Birther theory.
The other reason the Birther theory has caught on -- particularly among conservatives -- is the weakness of the Republican opposition.
Despite the GOP's success in slowing down ObamaCare, Democrats still have a huge majority in the House, a filibuster-proof margin in the Senate, and a White House that is aggressively expanding its executive power. One Republican leader after another has stepped down or been tarnished by scandal.
Many Americans -- including some who had convinced themselves that Obama was a moderate -- are eager for a way to stop the runaway left-wing agenda of Obama and Nancy Pelosi's Congress. In the absence of strong Republican leadership, some find the Birther theory a compelling, if desperate, solution.
Yet it is ultimately a self-destructive one -- not just because it is almost certainly false, but because it contradicts the essential spirit of the conservative movement.
The philosopher Robert Nozick distinguished between two approaches to political thought: the "invisible hand" and the "hidden hand." Those who embrace the "invisible hand" believe that people, given the freedom to make their own choices, tend to achieve social goals without being forced to do so.
Sometimes the invisible hand fails, and strong central leadership is needed. But as a general rule, free markets and civil liberties have worked well in promoting human progress. They have certainly proved better than the alternative, in the form of state control, which has produced only poverty, war, and misery.
"Hidden hand" thinkers, by contrast, believe that everything is controlled by unseen forces -- not spiritual but human in nature. Socialism thrives on such ideas, including the notion that big business is constantly manipulating all of us to feed its insatiable greed -- an idea that Obama and much of his left-wing base subscribes to quite openly. In fact, socialism depends on conspiracy theories to justify its war against personal liberty, to blame for its inevitable failures, and to cover up its own very real machinations.
The real "conspiracy" in American politics is the way in which special interest groups loyal to Obama now have unfettered access to power and public money. The unions that ran themselves to the brink of insolvency by giving millions of dollars to Obama and the Democrats, for instance, are being handed taxpayer bailouts and huge shares in companies newly acquired by our rapidly-expanding government, the better to begin the cycle anew.
The answer is to expose this corruption, to fight for policies consistent with American values of freedom, and to win elections again -- not to waste time and resources on political alchemy.
The Birther theory is, in effect if not in intent, a gift to the Obama administration, bequeathed by the indignant rump of the Clinton effort and now deployed against the Republican opposition. It is also deeply corrosive of the spirit of liberty that conservatives bring to American politics.
That is why conservatives and Republicans should reject it -- and dismiss with contempt the media's effort to hang it around our collective necks. There is enough in this administration to oppose on the merits -- or lack thereof.
Looks like everyone got the same memo from Obama today.
Sad because American Thinker was a LOT better than National Review.
The Birther theory is likewise an artifact of left-wing squabbles. Conservatives who are tempted by the Birther theory should ask themselves why the mainstream media is now so interested in the story when they were so reluctant to give any attention to the allegations during the 2008 campaign (when, if true, they might have made a difference).
***The question answers itself, duhhh. The MSM wasn’t interested for the very reason that they might have made a difference.
Did the liberals not espouse patently baseless and nearly insane “Bush theories” for the last 8 years?
Did they not admit, that although they were lies, these “theories” would evolve into effective “memes” and therefore influence the masses and so should be disseminated [pardon the pun] liberally and willfully?
Well, turnabout is fair play.
All hail the Kenyan born pseudo-POTUS.
“Rules For Radicals” can be used against them quite easily, especially since their messiah-puppet is just as effective as the ludicrous papier mache’ ones they carry in their histrionic “protests”.
The author is spot on.
But ours is a republic, so quit worryin' about it.
---
Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it!
www.AnySoldier.com
Now, with the apparent group-think dismissal of the birth certificate questions, any inquiry into his college transcripts or applications, his other published or non-published scholarly works and his actual workings as a "community organizer" especially with respect to his interaction with ACORN will all go unanswered. Presumably because they'll be dismissed as questions from a "fringe" element and the like.
Obama, and his compatriots are cunning, clever and thorough. They have made it clear that they are not to be trifled with. The only saving grace is even with the daily fawning media coverage, lack of journalistic curiosity into his actual background, and near domination of the news cycle, his poll number continue to gradually slide - as if the American electorate is starting to slowly wake, despite the dulcet tones of the media lullaby.
Alinsky ploy: Marginalize and ridicule your opponent.
They -want- people to “drop it” for fear of “looking crazy”.
I prefer the wild-eyed “crazy” patriots who freed us from King George to the “keep the peace at any cost” loyalist cowards, myself.
“The author is spot on”
Another Alinsky tactic.
Keep caving to enough of his “rules” and there will be NOTHING of America left.
Great post. It is all Alinsky. The second, third and fourth tier radio talk show hosts got the memo today to discredit the birthers or else.
Venezuela has one free TV station left and they were warned.
I suppose you have seen the actual birth certificate and can personally attest to the information on it?
Wrong. The Democrats and their media allies did the same thing to Sarah Palin. They do this to anything that threatens them.
Yup. EXACTLY.
They did the same thing and are still doing it to Sarah Palin because she is a threat to them. They only attack threats and the BC issue is a threat.
Interesting... how they mention that socialist regimes rely on skeptics for a scapegoat. It seems like such a conundrum. So, how can the honest people of the world actually win against a lie machine such as this? It seems to come back to religion, doesn’t it?
My guess is that with a grand total of ZERO Republican House Members willing to go on the record saying that Obama was not born in Hawaii, that they are not all that worried.
However, yes, Obama and the DNC are keeping the BC issue out there to distract.
He's threatened me one too many times for it to be otherwise.
What that means is I look at the "Birther" phenomenon as just desserts for an incompetent boob. He knows all he has to do is publish his Hawaii "long form" birth certificate (which names the attending physician and witnesses of his birth) and that's the end of the story.
His failure to do so can no longer be attributed to his ignorance or inability to understand the meaning of "words" but to ulterior motives ~ e.g. that the guys who give him his lines think the dispute has value to them so no matter how bad it makes Obama look it provides a benefit of some sort to themselves.
People who don't particularly care where he was born, or if he was born at all, can and do find it curious that he is not allowed by his handlers to make the decision that defuses the situation.
Eventually the "Birthers" will not appear so ridiculous to the MSM and the faux conservatives who serve as their running dog lackeys (since they all have a difficult time keeping such stories in their minds), but Obama will continue to appear to be a sock puppet ~ and that, in fact, is the ultimate damage to Obama.
Guy doesn't have enough cojones to do what's needed to stop the discussion of the matter, or to simply tell everyone to shut up about his mother.
I think Bill Ayers wrote the wrong book ~ it's not about Obama and his shiftless, no good father, it's really about Obama and his mother who died, abandoning him to a cruel world. I'm much more curious about why he let's people drag his mother through the mud.
There is no birther theory. There is just a call for Obama to show his long form vault BC, which he has spent near a million dollars to avoid doing, and has even rescinded the orders of a soldier who sued him, in order to void his standing as a plaintiff and thus avoid having to prove up his eligibility in court.
Obama obviously has something to hide or he would have showed the BC when mac did. Birthers are not nutty, all they want is the truth about Obama. Its nutty, really really nutty, to not want to know the truth about him if you care about this country.
Wrong. They are using Alinksy tactics to try to discredit. Same thing they are doing to Sarah Palin. They do that to things that threaten them.
The publishing business is always tough and must be brutal in a recession (you can’t eat paper). If Obama is willing to throw down over $1M in legal fees (or $60K for a beach house rental), he can probably afford a few “generous contributions” to sponsor favorable press in “conservative” media.
I don’t blame anyone for taking free money in tough times - it may not be ethical but it keeps the lights on.
Fortunately, World Net Daily probably can’t be bought, so there’s that.
How many months and countless hours did the State Run Media run stories during the 2004 election questioning Bush’s national guard records? Nuff said
How quickly we forget
Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints — none! There is no Obama documentation — no bona fides — no paper trail — nothing.
Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released
Certificate of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro adoption records — Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released
Punahou School records — Not released
Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
Occidental College records — Not released
Passport (Pakistan) — Not released
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia thesis — Not released
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles — None (maybe 1, unsigned?)
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not released
Illinois State Senate records — None
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
Law practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.