Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public opinion turning against global warming almost as quickly as science (Ten AGW Myths Debunked)
Macon County Conservative Examiner ^ | 28 July 2009 | Robert Moon

Posted on 07/30/2009 9:12:25 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE

Chapter 4 of my book, titled, "An Inconvenient Hoax," systematically exposes and confronts all the most current science fiction being shoved down our throats by the Luddite absolutists and pseudo-intellectual scam artists of the left. It is devastating.

Unsurprisingly, there is a flurry of new data pouring in even further confirming how utterly baseless this invented Green Scare really is, now even from Obama's own people. Much like the Swine Flu and about a gazillion other contrived alarmist fantasies from decades past (breast implants, Alar, the Millenium bug, DDT, etc.), public faith in the environmentalist religion is consequently fading, and fast. As Investor's Business Daily put it:

Nearly half (48%) believe the cause is naturally occurring planetary trends. Just a year ago, only 34% said warming was a natural phenomenon, while 47% said human activity was placing the planet at risk of disastrous climate change. That's a huge shift.

Interestingly, a growing number of Americans (58%) say we need to build more nuclear power plants, with 63% saying that finding additional sources of energy is more important than reducing the amount of energy Americans currently consume. They recognize that a growing economy requires more energy, not less, and that nukes are a pollution-free way of getting it.

Even countries utterly saturated with the left's absurd scare-mongering on this, like Australia, are producing loud voices of reason in an ocean of bogus, hysterical environmental propaganda.

As Andrew Bolt, of The Herald Sun put it (on 4/29/09):

Global warming alarmists must be feeling a chill as new facts overwhelm their fiction. It's snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever. And that's just the news of the past week.

Bolt then issued a challenge...

Here's a test: Name just three clear signs the planet is warming...Just three. Chances are your "proofs" are in fact on my list of 10 Top Myths about global warming. And if your "proofs" indeed turn out to be false, don't get angry with me.

Just ask yourself: Why do you still believe that man is heating the planet to hell? What evidence do you have? So let's see if facts matter more to you than faith, and observations more than predictions.

The List...


Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week "temperatures have dropped...both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites." In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out half the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain's Hadley Centre, NASA's Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man's rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.

But that's all theory. The question I've asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?


Wrong. The British Antarctic Survey, working with NASA, last week confirmed ice around Antarctica has grown 100,000 sq km each decade for the past 30 years. Long-term monitoring by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports the same: southern hemisphere ice has been expanding for decades.

As for the Arctic, wrong again. The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered. Satellite data from NASA's Marshall Space Flight Centre this week shows the Arctic hasn't had this much April ice for at least seven years.

Norway's Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre says the ice is now within the standard deviation range for 1979 to 2007.


Wrong. A study released this month by the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre confirms not only that we've had worse droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by "global warming," whether man-made or not.

As the university's press release says: "The causes of southeastern Australia's longest, most severe and damaging droughts have been discovered, with the surprise finding that they originate far away in the Indian Ocean...A team of Australian scientists has detailed for the first time how a phenomenon known as the Indian Ocean Dipole (a variable and irregular cycle of warming and cooling of ocean water), dictates whether moisture-bearing winds are carried across the southern half of Australia."


Wrong. The alleged "record" temperature Melbourne set in January (46.4 degrees) was in fact topped by the 47.2 degrees the city recorded in 1851. (See the Argus newspaper of February 8, 1851.)

And here's another curious thing: Despite all this warming we're alleged to have caused, Victoria's highest temperature on record remains the 50.7 degrees that hit Mildura 103 years ago. South Australia's hottest day is still the 50.7 degrees Oodnadatta suffered 37 years ago. NSW's high is still the 50 degrees recorded 70 years ago. What's more, not one of the world's seven continents has set a record high temperature since 1974. Europe's high remains the 50 degrees measured in Spain 128 years ago, before the invention of the first true car.


Wrong. If anything, the seas are getting colder. For five years, a network of 3175 automated bathythermographs has been deployed in the oceans by the Argo program, a collaboration between 50 agencies from 26 countries. Warming believer Josh Willis, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, reluctantly concluded: "There has been a very slight cooling..."


Wrong. For almost three years, the seas have stopped rising, according to the Jason-1 satellite mission monitored by the University of Colorado. That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon. But there is little sign of any accelerated rises, even off Tuvalu or the Maldives, islands often said to be most threatened with drowning.

Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world's most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years. Venice is still above water.


Wrong. Ryan Maue of Florida State University recently measured the frequency, intensity and duration of all hurricanes and cyclones to compile an Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index. His findings? The energy index is at its lowest level for more than 30 years.

The World Meteorological Organization, in its latest statement on [hurricanes], said it was impossible to say if they were affected by man's gases: "Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point."


Wrong. Yes, in 1999, Professor Ove Hoegh-Gulberg, our leading reef alarmist and administrator of more than $30 million in warming grants, did claim the reef was threatened by warming, and much had turned white. But he then had to admit it had made a "surprising" recovery.

Yes, in 2006 he again warned high temperatures meant "between 30 and 40% of coral on Queensland's Great Barrier Reef could die within a month." But he later admitted this bleaching had "minimal impact".

Yes, in 2007 he again warned that temperature changes of the kind caused by global warming were bleaching the reef. But this month fellow Queensland University researchers admitted in a study that reef coral had once more made a "spectacular recovery," with "abundant corals re-established in a single year." The reef is blooming.


Wrong. Poor snow falls in 2003 set off a rash of headlines predicting warming doom. The CSIRO typically fed the hysteria by claiming global warming would strip resorts of up to a quarter of their snow by 2018. Yet the past two years have been bumper seasons for Victoria's snow resorts, and this year could be just as good, with snow already falling in NSW and Victoria this past week.


Are you insane? Tsunamis are in fact caused by earthquakes. Yet there [were the alarmists] last week, claiming that Asia was a "region, thanks to climate change, that has far more cyclones, tsunamis, droughts." Wrong, wrong and wrong...

Bolt wasn't finished...

[Every] disaster is now blamed on man-made warming the way they once were on Satan. See for yourself on the full list, including kidney stones, volcanic eruptions, lousy wine, insomnia, bad tempers, Vampire moths and bubonic plagues. Nothing is too far-fetched to be seized upon by carpetbaggers and wild preachers as signs of a warming we can't actually see.

Not for nothing are polar bears--the perfect symbol of this faith, bears said to be threatened by warming, when their numbers have in fact increased. Bottom line: fewer people now die from extreme weather events, whether cyclones, floods or blinding heatwaves.

Read that in a study by Indur Goklany, who represented the US at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: "There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk."

So stop this crazy panic.

First step: check again your list of the signs you thought you saw of global warming. How many are true? What do you think, and why do you think it? Yes, the world may resume warming in one year or 100. But it hasn't been warming as the alarmists said it must if man were to blame, and certainly not as the media breathlessly keeps claiming.

Best we all just settle down, then, and wait for the proof -- the real proof. After all, panicking over invisible things is so undignified, don't you think?

The evidence is overwhelming. Astrologers are more scientific than liberals. This anti-science crusade is about nothing more than Democrat power and control, as with everything the left does.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hype; hysteria; myths
Excellent little summary - and noticed its from the hinterlands - NOT from our masters and "powers-that-be" in the ABCNNBCBS editorial quagmire in LA, NY, DC, London, or Chicago!

(This article was found at

1 posted on 07/30/2009 9:12:25 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xcamel; neverdem; narses; steelyourfaith; sionnsar

Let us hope his book, “An Inconvenient Hoax” will do well in the market.

2 posted on 07/30/2009 9:13:22 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

GREAT!!!! This is another giant counterfeit that the lying counterfeit in office wants to shove down our throats.

3 posted on 07/30/2009 9:15:29 AM PDT by bareford101 (the obamanation is a COUNTERFEIT with a COUNTERFEIT birth cert. & 39 different ss cards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

1970’s - Pollution - Air Scare - all will be wearing gas masks by 2000...
1980’s - Global Cooling scare through “Nuclear Winter”
1990’s - Ozone layer disappearing scare....
2000’s - Global Warming Scare....

What’s next?

2010’s - Over population scare? Swine or Pandemic Scare? Bee’s disappearing?

4 posted on 07/30/2009 9:17:08 AM PDT by Maringa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Global warming is the biggest fraud, well, since Obama.

5 posted on 07/30/2009 9:18:34 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

FReepmail me to get on or off

Ping me if you find one I've missed.

6 posted on 07/30/2009 9:27:54 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I agree it's an excellent article.

I think we have to be a bit careful in pointing out the cooling of the last decade. What it shows is there is no link between CO2 concentrations and warming temps since the concentration grew so much in that decade.

But this cooling trend will likely be followed by a warming trend since by the historical data we're not quite at the next interglacial max. At least I hope not. God help us if we're dropping prematurely into the next glacial cycle. That would not be good for our civilization.

7 posted on 07/30/2009 9:33:16 AM PDT by colorado tanker ("Ah guess I talked stupidly when I said the officer acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Thanks for the ping.

8 posted on 07/30/2009 9:35:15 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Thanks good stuff the examiners have.

9 posted on 07/30/2009 9:39:38 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world's most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years.

Great post, RotertACook


10 posted on 07/30/2009 9:45:15 AM PDT by GOPJ (Maldives sea levels have NOT risen in 1250 years -Professor Nils-Axel Moerner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Genesis defender; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; ...
Excellent, Thanx !


Beam me to Planet Gore !

11 posted on 07/30/2009 10:08:32 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Yes, public opinion may be turning, but Government is heck-bent on Cap and Tax because they see $$$$ all over the place. IOW the next bubble market for them to exploit. How do we get enough people to call and write to their congressional dictators to thwart the AlGore’s of the world desire to fleece the sheep? Cap and Tax has already passed the House of Reps! It is one Senate vote away from Obarmy signing it into law.

I don’t see how the tide turning now after the foundation has been undermined by it will make a difference.

12 posted on 07/30/2009 12:24:54 PM PDT by Horusra (The Democrat party is now the National Socialist party (nationalize the banks, socialize healthcare))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson