~~~~~~~~
At one point, Øbama's attorneys argued that the release of Øbama's, birth records would result in "embarrassment".
1) What "embarrassment" could result from data on his "vault" certificate -- that did not appear on the "released" COLB?
2) Does anyone have good documentation of the above "embarrassment" objection to the release of Øbama's birth records?
~~~~~~~~
From the "Timeline":
" One of Obama’s Web sites, FightTheSmears.com, affirms, “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.” This statement by the Obama campaign admits that he was a British citizen at birth and thus had dual citizenship (even if he was born in the United States) With dual citizenship and split loyalties at birth, Obama is arguably not a natural born citizen and is ineligible to serve as president of the United States. [507]"
This "admission" is the clearest argument that Øbama could not possibly be a "Natural born citizen". However, the website that posted the "admission" that Øbama held, at birth, British subject status (factcheck.org) has reportedly been "taken down" in the recent past.
3) Does anyone have a screenshot of the above "admission" -- and/or a URL where the page is cached?