Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 12Gauge687

I gotta think removing the flagpole will cost more that $300 and there will be no more vandalism on an empty pole than it receives now. Spending dollars to save pennies ... gotta be the gubermint.


17 posted on 08/01/2009 1:08:57 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (if the government makes trading a used car this hard how are they going to handle a doctor visit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

Might also have to do with liability. In construction, we recommend removal of scaffolding by a certain date during the construction (i.e. within 15 days of completion of tuckpointing) so other subcontractors can’t use it for their purposes. Often, the sub who specified the scaffolding asks to be indeminified.

Since the town of Clearwater can’t get everyone to hold the town harmless or indemnify it, removal was likely a cheap option. Whether the town is self-insured or uses a commercial company, somebody probably told them the unmaintained poles would be a liability issue.


22 posted on 08/01/2009 1:22:01 PM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson