See - what I don’t understand is the following statement:
“...if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years”
I can’t decide if this implies that a consultation is mandatory if one hasn’t been made in the last five years, OR, if it’s implying that a consultation is only possible if you haven’t had one in the last five years.
Without seeing “paragraph 3”, I’m not sure what this means, though you seem to believe it’s mandatory.
Everytime you go over five years, you will have to have another "consultation".
Unless you get sick in between, then the other wording I included in that last post applies.
It's the federal government...they will take this verbiage and run with it for all its worth. We dare not let them hold such wording in law over us.