Why does Neal Boortz think something so fundamentally Constitutional is meaningless? Is being a natural born citizen a requirement (in Boortz’ mind) or not?
No matter the outcome, is this the period in time in our nation’s history where we go from being a nation of laws to a nation of men? After all, Obama brought his Chicago thuggish pay to play system with him to Chicago.
This does remind me of the Clinton years where every violation was treated with a “so what” and if you pointed out the Constitution and the laws broken you’d get a “who cares” for a follow up. Last night, Bill O’Reilly basically said “nobody cares” when Chris Ruddy mentioned all the other documents (in addition to the birth certificate) that Obama hasn’t released. I didn’t know the law and knowledge was based on uninformed people “caring”???
A few of the posters here have wondered why some conservatives are bashing the so called “birthers” and a handful of posters here have snidely referred to conservatives bashing birthers as the “smart ones”.
Hey, when Obama was born, is it true or false that there were four ways to obtain a Cert. of Live Birth, right? And isn’t it true that all one of the four ways was simply for someone (anyone) to call in to the authorizing agency and simply report a birth at home with no verification?
You see, if Boortz was principaled and not just narcissistic (which a lot of libertarians actuall are - even though I certainly lean libertarian), then why doesn’t he tell us the important verified facts that he possesses and even collect on the $100,000 reward that is floating out there for anyone who can prove Obama was truly born in Hawaii. I think Neal Boortz is actually just a showman putting on a fun show.
Rush Limbaugh is on record asking about the birth certificate on his show.
We “birthers” just want to know the truth. Show us the truth (and that does not mean referring to the COLB) and we’ll be happy.