This may explain why Vladimir Putin is more a Republican than George Bush ever was.
To: Bushwacker777
China's forced policy has come back to bite them. America's is doing a similar thing. “Thou shalt not Murder” when ignored, always comes back to bite. Unusually with a vengeance.
2 posted on
08/04/2009 7:26:07 AM PDT by
sr4402
To: Bushwacker777
No wonder Stalin outlawed abortions: he was too busy killing off the grownups, not to mention all the starvation that was aborting people by the millions.
3 posted on
08/04/2009 7:29:34 AM PDT by
Migraine
(Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
To: Bushwacker777; Calm_Cool_and_Elected
To: Bushwacker777
Attempts to draw a parallel between Soviet pro-family policies and present-day pro-life movements are completely bogus. There was not widespread birth control in the Soviet days, nor was out-of-wedlock motherhood commonly accepted then; so the Reds used pro-marriage, pro-natalist policies to swell the ranks of Communists.
Today, socialist/fascist governments in the West use illegal immigration to accomplish the same goal. In Europe, several countries extend welfare benefits not only to muslim immigrant families, but also to the multiple wives and their children of muslim males. Here in the post-birth-control U.S., we no longer care if people breed without marriage or preparation for supporting children -- everybody gets some kind of government handout.
5 posted on
08/04/2009 7:37:43 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("Media: quit making things up." --Sarah Palin)
To: Bushwacker777
I've studied the playgrounds and puppet theatres for children that the soviets built. I'm always eagre for new pictures. There were some nightmare pieces but, for the most part, they lavished money, care, and time on building them. In many cases, the very best sculptors and painters they had on hand were found to decorate these buildings and toys. They obviously cherished children.
Homosexuality was forbidden as "counter revolutionary" since it was seen as a habit of decadent capitalists and aristocrats. It was "treated" with ECT right up until the end and for a little bit after.
To: Bushwacker777
Well, yes and no.
Stalin did encourage large families, at times when he wanted more workers and more troops. But Communism also insisted that religion was the opiate of the masses and that conventional morality was dead. Marriage was a bourgeouis institution, faithfulness was a foolish dream of the past, relegated to the dust bin of history.
Stalin also suggested that children should rat to the Secret Police on their parents, husbands should rat on their wives, and wives should rat on their husbands, because loyalty to the state superseded all other loyalties.
So, let’s not get too starry eyed about the virtues of Stalinist ideology.
7 posted on
08/04/2009 7:39:00 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Bushwacker777
Abortion was legalized later and used as birth control, but only because the defunct Soviet economy could not produce things such as condoms. Why didn't they ban sex ?
8 posted on
08/04/2009 7:49:35 AM PDT by
libh8er
To: Bushwacker777
I’ve always wondered if the American Left is even the same ideology as that espoused by Todor Zhivkov. Somehow I think Communist Bulgaria was much more sane than Communist America will be.
10 posted on
08/04/2009 7:57:14 AM PDT by
Zionist Conspirator
(Lo' `al-halechem levaddo yichyeh ha'adam, ki `al-kol-motza' Fi-HaShem yichyeh ha'adam.)
To: Bushwacker777
11 posted on
08/04/2009 8:18:33 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: Bushwacker777
The Soviets sought to undermine our system. And then they blame us when we became “degenerate”.
Stuff it Commies.
12 posted on
08/04/2009 8:19:37 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: Bushwacker777
Marxist/fascists claim their authority from the "will of the people". Radical Islamics claim their authority from the "will of God". Our founders were classical liberals who derived their authority as servants of the individual. A far cry from today's liberals and conservatives. Today's liberals and conservatives generally fall under the first category.
15 posted on
08/04/2009 8:36:20 AM PDT by
armymarinedad
(Support, v., To take the side of; to uphold or help.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson