Have to run. Leaving your "commercial" criticism aside, you are saying then in your "professional" opinion that the Australian photo is untouched and legitimate? Is that what should be gleaned from your very long post? You did not see photoshop tags (editable by the way) so this was real and not manipulated? From you post it sounds like you are calling the Kenyan document a fraud, but the Australian is real. Was that the conclusion you reached in your very "long" post? Is this what you are telling me and the Freepers on this thread?
Your saying this is the fraud (Kenyan)?
Your saying this is the truth (Australian)
Anticipating your expert and reasoned reply!
I would really like to know what you really think about these images. These are the originals. The Kenyan can not be proven one way or the other. The Australian is glaring to any layperson. I will give you a hint. There are more than a few problems with the bottom photo.