Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
she is making a serious tactical mistake which could come back to burn her and damage her credibility.

I wasn't aware she had any of that -- credibility, that is. Did you catch her shrieking on MSNBC last evening? A professional doesn't shriek or scream if they wish to be taken seriously. And why on earth would anyone with "credibility" agree to appear with Schuster on MSNBC, or Colbert? Did she actually think she wouldn't be attacked or mocked? Or she just so deparate for attention she'll appear anywhere she's invited? I'm almost expecting her to pop up next on state-controlled Russian TV, since that's where she's headed.

From her so-called "debunking" --

2. More then one person had certified copies of this document.

Who are these persons who have "certified copies?" She originally stated that one source had "authenticated" this document -- from what, a photo?  And who is this "authenticator"? -- certainly no credentialed document expert would be foolish enough to authenticate a document from a photograph. And a photograph is all that Orly has, since she filed a photo of the document, same as posted on the net, with her latest submission to the court.

97 posted on 08/04/2009 1:59:18 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: browardchad
"since she filed a photo of the document, same as posted on the net..."

Only a total wack job would make such a stupid, obviously false assertion.

105 posted on 08/04/2009 2:13:23 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson