1.) This subject has been killed in other threads, why start over.
Bomford is a fraud and too cute by half and again.
2.) the Kenyan BC has been examined by a Document Examiner and found I am supposing not to be printed with a laser jet or an ink jet printer, we can't say the same about Bomford.
3. In Mega-thread Jr. the provenance of Bomford was traced to someone perfectly capable of this fraud
4. The image in question was not cached with this site for the previous 2 year, it suddenly appeared days ago.
It is insane that someone would choose this specific Australian BC as the template to forge a Kenyan BC, the "finder" tells a tale of looking all over the net.. and happening to find the one and only digital image that exactly matches the Kenyan BC! This is absurd. Add the fact that the forger then kept many details the same to make sure that Bronson was identifiably identical to the Kenyan B.C. when these could have been easily changed as in the crest and you get .. too cute by half. This is a plant intended to be used just as it is, to sow disinformation.
Why do this to counter an obvious fraud? Enough.
Because we need a thread on Bomford, as some have suggested. Divorced from the 2000 post. And you just contributed, so thanks.
Because the Joker won't reveal his real COLB?????
Would you indulge me and tell me how this is known? Because, on Sunday night, when the Bomford cert first emerged, a code was supplied which one could paste into the address bar of the Bomford website. That code was said to show when the last modification was made to the website. When I did that, I saw that the last modification was in 2007.
As I await your answer, I will look for those posts.
4. The image in question was not cached with this site for the previous 2 year, it suddenly appeared days ago.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307517/posts?q=1&;page=51#65
see post 75 on thread
When we did that in real time on 8-3 (immediately after the Aussie cert became available)the “last modified” date of the Bomford website was shown to be 2006.
What is the evidence that the Bomford cert did NOT exist before 8-2-09?
The numbers matching on the Obama and the Bomford are astronomically unlikely. Therefore, one of them must almost certainly be a fraud designed to discredit the other. Other threads on FR have discussed the fact that typing does not undulate with the folds on Bomford. For Obama to be the fraud, someone would have had to be able to deceive Taitz, or someone higher up the chain than Taitz, about the provenance and genuineness of it. (Orly, what does the raised seal actually say? That would be hard to forge.)
Concerning Bomford, I am skeptical about the radio interview with “Bomford.” Was it really him? He might be in on the fraud. At any rate, he did not provide positive identification, only saying that it “looks like” something that would be his BC. Head hurts, must stop.