Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

He makes his living as a "conservative" who can reliably be counted on to sell out conservatives and Republicans at every opportunity.

Nice work, if you can get it.

1 posted on 08/09/2009 10:44:10 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mojito

Hey the BOZO spends all his time in NYC on the political correct level and fancies himsel as a conservative. Yo Ho Ho..In his circles a conservative is one whothinks Arloen Spectre is a Right Wing Extremeist.


2 posted on 08/09/2009 10:49:13 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

This false conservative was exposed a long time ago. Another term for them often is “establishment” conservative. Which just about means that they are paid to sell out conservative values & positions.


3 posted on 08/09/2009 10:52:05 PM PDT by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
These media elites know exactly what they are doing & saying and THEY ARE INSANE, not Rush Limbaugh!

Maybe the New York & DC elites should actually READ THE DAMN BILL, especially if they are going to make such outlandish claims about who & why people are protesting!

At least, the people protesting have READ THE BILL! That's more than we can say about the people who will be voting on it!

4 posted on 08/09/2009 10:54:43 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
I hadn't seen the Rush Limbaugh thing.

Dereliction of duty, Brooks.

1) Limbaugh is a very big part of this debate. You should know what he is saying.

2) If you don't know what Limbaugh said you should NOT be commenting on it based upon the snippet NBC provided.

5 posted on 08/09/2009 10:58:24 PM PDT by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
He makes his living as a "conservative" who can reliably be counted on to sell out conservatives and Republicans at every opportunity.

Is he talking about McCain? Graham? Gergen? etc. etc. etc.

6 posted on 08/09/2009 11:12:11 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obama is in way over his ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

It was Pelosi who started the nazi accusations. Limbaugh was responding.

Is it insane to respond to Pelosi? No, distasteful perhaps, but as long as Californians insist on sending her to Washington we’ll have to respond to her from time to time.

The problem isn’t Limbaugh. He doesn’t live in California, he doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that she’s in the position she is in to say the things she says.


7 posted on 08/09/2009 11:16:09 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
MR. GREGORY: Republicans in office and on the airwaves insist the anger is real, reflecting real fears about a government takeover of the healthcare system. But the rhetoric has become extreme.

Funny how when nut jobs were protesting military action, hanging President Bush in effigy, and ANSWER and MoveOn were organizing demonstrations, the MSM never questioned if the anger is real.

8 posted on 08/10/2009 12:19:29 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

David Brooks needs to reveal that his good friend Rahm Emmanual
got him vip seating and backstage passes to Brooks’ hero
Bruce Springsteen. Brooks has been even more fawning over
Obama and Emmanual since then. He should disclose his sell-out.


10 posted on 08/10/2009 4:59:18 AM PDT by gussiefinknottle (woof!woof!woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

David Brooks needs to reveal that his good friend Rahm Emmanual
got him vip seating and backstage passes to Brooks’ hero
Bruce Springsteen. Brooks has been even more fawning over
Obama and Emmanual since then. He should disclose his sell-out.


11 posted on 08/10/2009 4:59:28 AM PDT by gussiefinknottle (woof!woof!woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

David Brooks is a sack of sh!t. Without the sack.


14 posted on 08/10/2009 6:06:04 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson