Posted on 08/10/2009 12:24:07 PM PDT by jazusamo
I may be wrong, but didn’t California Fish and Game do an aerial cull of goats on some of their offshore islands a few years ago?
I don’t know if they used aircraft or not but they have culled island goats.
Alaska’s perfect answer would be to trap the excess wolves and release them on the estates of these clowns.
ROTFLMAO!
Yes, they may be fine with it, but I find shooting animals from aircraft to be distasteful.
If the cost per animal was broken down, which would include aircraft maintenance, fuel, pilot services, etc, were figured out, I wonder if that amount could be used as a bounty, to give incentive for more individuals to cull the packs.
Yes. I am a hunter from way back, and a carnivore.
I realise it is culling/animal control, not hunting. I don’t see why organised hunts cannot be conducted via aircraft to those locations, and expeditions sent out from a centralised landing zone.
If we do not want to continually hear from these anti-hunting/gun types, something must be done. Otherwise, I’m betting we will see the end of the wolf-control programs, completely.
Thank you for your most polite comments.
Access from lakes, is very doable. It would not be easy, but can be done, if the incentive is there. The alternative, is to continually see this issue all over the media in the lower 48, which will result in such negative PR, that the culling process, will probably come to an end soon. This would at least control some of the population, instead of none of it.
What? Fish in a barrel? I’ll bet you oppose fishing with dynamite too
Well then Alaska should just tell the feds that it is none of their business how Alaska controls their wildlife. I hope they do. The feds have no business interfering in any of this.
TO HELL with PR. or PC BS. If it’s right it’s right. That’s the trouble today everyone worrying about PR instead of standing up for what’s right. Grow a pair
Amen to that, I don’t see any justification for the feds to get involved with this.
Have you by chance read any other of my posts, it doesn’t sound like it?
Lol, the bill will basically require another unfunded mandate...for helicopters.
LOL! Works for me and it would definitely be good training for the UAV operators.
“I wonder if that amount could be used as a bounty, to give incentive for more individuals to cull the packs.”
As I understand it, wolves are quite difficult quarry on foot. Also remember you’re talking about possibly hundreds of miles of off-road Alaskan travel to get to the area.
I’d love to have a chance to hunt Alaskan wolf sometime. It might not be too hard to attempt combined with a caribou or bear hunt. I’m not sure about the rules regarding out of state take of predators in Alaska.
Another method of culling would be trapping for fur, which I’m sure occurs to some extent already. Wolf fur is the premier trim for extreme conditions parkas.
As I said, with the proper incentive, just about anything can happen. Some here seem to think I advocate the cessation of animal population control, that is far from the truth. I would like to see some alternative methods used though. With the political atmosphere we have today, and the media so against anything that concerns guns, we have to think of something. I can easily foresee the day that this population control program, and others like it, will cease. Who knows what leanings the next gov of Alaska will have. I am an avid hunter , gun enthusiast and outdoor sports nut, and I find shooting animals from aircraft to be repulsive, just think how those that really don’t like guns or hunting at all think. I do not want to see our outdoor heritage taken away or reduced politically, just because no one wants to try a different approach. Those that are against us are very strong and manipulative, I do not like giving them ammunition to use against us.
These people NEVER give up......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.