Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadelineZapeezda

It is his right, and to some extent in the other town halls, some responsible exercise of the 2nd Amendment may be necessary to guarantee the exercise of the 1st.

However, I would also not have done so today. Whether we like it or not, there is a different “security” standard that applies to the POTUS, whether he is Republican or democrat. I would not openly carry a weapon anywhere near a presidential event. It’s a matter of personal discretion.


44 posted on 08/11/2009 8:59:42 AM PDT by henkster (The frog has noticed the increase in water temperature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: henkster

It’s a matter of personal discretion.

Pussy


86 posted on 08/11/2009 9:14:06 AM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (That Kenyan bastard is not my president. ENFORCE the Bill of Rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

‘However, I would also not have done so today. Whether we like it or not, there is a different “security” standard that applies to the POTUS’

I do agree with your sentiment. Still, since the White House ratcheted up the tension by sending out Union goons to intimidate opponents to Deathcare, it’s not unreasonable for protestors to be concerned about their own safety.


113 posted on 08/11/2009 9:24:24 AM PDT by joejm65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: henkster
"However, I would also not have done so today. Whether we like it or not, there is a different “security” standard that applies to the POTUS, whether he is Republican or democrat. I would not openly carry a weapon anywhere near a presidential event. It’s a matter of personal discretion."

He might risk being tackled by the secret service if he showed up at the same time as the pres, but I would think they check out the situation before he is anywhere near the place, and would probably tell the guy to take it home, or turn it over for the duration of the visit.

123 posted on 08/11/2009 9:29:35 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

There is also concern about any of these protests turning into a melee, and in a melee guns can be grabbed. But again, he didn’t ask me and I admire the pluck.


160 posted on 08/11/2009 9:48:33 AM PDT by ichabod1 (I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet (GOP Poet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

I agree. Neither would I. In fact, I’m pretty careful where I carry mine. Things have really changed since even my grandparents’ youth, when a firearm was just part of your everyday wardrobe. They could not have DREAMED that this would be the issue it has become. Of course, they lived in the hills and knobs of rural Tennessee/western N.C., but that’s a different story.


299 posted on 08/11/2009 11:03:54 AM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: henkster
"However, I would also not have done so today."

A right that you fear to exercise is a right that you've surrendered.

402 posted on 08/11/2009 4:40:39 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson