I don’t believe so, but either way, it was uncalled for. If she had wanted to avoid the topic, she could have done so politely by just saying that she hadn’t studied the issue, so couldn’t really comment on it. But she didn’t do that. She chose instead to insult those of us who think the POTUS should be required to follow the eligibility requirements of the constitution. And this coming from a lawyer who claims to be a conservative.
Maybe she DID research the topic and found the birther case lacking in both merit and legal reasoning.
She is a lawyer, and after reading her books and hearing her talk off the cuff, a conservative.