Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grassley: We've taken end-of-life measures out of Senate health bill
Washington Examiner ^ | 08-13-09 | Byron York

Posted on 08/13/2009 11:14:56 AM PDT by theruleshavechanged

Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, who is working with Finance Committee chairman Sen. Max Baucus on a health care compromise, has just issued a statement saying that concerns about end-of-life issues in the House health care bill are entirely legitimate. In addition, Grassley says the Finance Committee has "dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration entirely" because of those fears and also because of concerns that they could be "implemented incorrectly."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; democrats; endoflife; euthanasia; grassley; healthcare; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Well that's a start .. . but how about you just trash the whole thing.
1 posted on 08/13/2009 11:15:02 AM PDT by theruleshavechanged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged
No thanks, Chuck.
Either kill this thing off, dead, or get out of the way.
2 posted on 08/13/2009 11:17:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

not good enough. take out pages 1 through 1,017. that’s a start.


3 posted on 08/13/2009 11:18:19 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

He’s easing his constituants into his supporting the bill in September. Besides, the Dems will NEVER let this “compromise” stand when it comes to “reconciliation.”


4 posted on 08/13/2009 11:18:52 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

What about the health Gestapo coming into your homes


5 posted on 08/13/2009 11:19:05 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Grassley figures he has to do something. He is a feaking ignoramus. Anything he does, anything he suggests, will be used by Obama to screw Republicans. As for Baucus, Obama’s catamite should be hammered so hard in Montana that he is afraid to show his face outside of his comfortable haunts inside the beltway.


6 posted on 08/13/2009 11:19:52 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Exactly why I trust no politician. Grassley is still working on the damn thing.

And, I thought that provision wasn’t even in there to begin with? That’s what the libs keep saying.


7 posted on 08/13/2009 11:20:51 AM PDT by Soul Seeker ( qite often tha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

1017 pages to go


8 posted on 08/13/2009 11:21:03 AM PDT by GeronL (http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Chucky forgets that it is in the most of the house versions. What happens if this gets voted in and goes to conference. Do you think the Repubs will be at the table? What a moron!!!


9 posted on 08/13/2009 11:21:16 AM PDT by HOYA97 (Hoya Saxa = What Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Negotiating over details seeks to pass what is fundamentally unacceptable: gov’t interference in the doctor/patient relationship.


10 posted on 08/13/2009 11:21:24 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Your opinion is doubleplusungoodthinkful. You have been reported to flag@whitehouse.gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Let’s see the revised bill before you vote on it.


11 posted on 08/13/2009 11:21:31 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Live free or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Good advice. I think that even though it might not be in the Senate bill, we should still be outraged that Congress considered it in the House bill. We should not forget that the Senate bill is a compromise from what they wanted to what they thought they could get away with....for the moment.


12 posted on 08/13/2009 11:22:51 AM PDT by madinmadtown (Nuclear...better to mispronounce it, than not understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Whats wrong with this azzwipe? Scrap the damn thing and take the rest out fool.


13 posted on 08/13/2009 11:23:59 AM PDT by dforest (Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

He’s trying to get a couple of token Republican Senators on board so he can claim bipartisanship and shove it through.


14 posted on 08/13/2009 11:24:09 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Big whoop. You know it’s coming right back in in conference.


15 posted on 08/13/2009 11:26:03 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged
Three cheers for "The Mob":

Kick Obama's socialist arse, kick Obama's socialist arse, kick Obama's socialist arse!

Of course this isn't anywhere near good enough. But it's a start and an indication that the twits in DC, especially the dem twits from red states, are listening.

16 posted on 08/13/2009 11:27:04 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (CommieCare: Need a Stent, Take a Pain Pill. Next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged
A guy at the townhall asked an excellent question yesterday.

Something like this: “Senator Grassley; where in the Constitution does it give the government power to take over our health care system?”

Chuck hesitated about 2 seconds, and said something like “The government doesn’t have that power”

Great question, and great answer..

17 posted on 08/13/2009 11:27:04 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Just say no to Soylent Green health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat; theruleshavechanged; pabianice; Melchior

“not good enough. take out pages 1 through 1,017. that’s a start.”

These guys just don’t get it - this is not about a detail here and there. WE WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO STAY THE HELL OUT OF OUR LIVES.

They, who took the oath to defend the constitution, a constitution whose primary goal was to LIMIT the power of the federal government, are instead raping it and in the process are raping our FREEDOMS.


18 posted on 08/13/2009 11:28:21 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theruleshavechanged

Wow. A RINO speaking out against this provision. That should go a long way towards validating how bad this bill is.


19 posted on 08/13/2009 11:30:54 AM PDT by Born Conservative (Working hard so those on public assistance don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Let’s see the revised bill before you vote on it.

Hey, FRiend, I think you meant to say:

Let’s see the revised bill before you vote on it!!!

Just trying to help.

20 posted on 08/13/2009 11:31:00 AM PDT by paulycy (Screw the RACErs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson