Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Shifts Focus To Renting, Not Owning Home
Boston Globe ^ | 8-16-09 | Joseph Williams

Posted on 08/16/2009 9:01:49 AM PDT by joinedafterattack

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration, in a major shift on housing policy, is abandoning George W. Bush’s vision of creating an “ownership society’’ and instead plans to pump $4.25 billion of economic stimulus money into creating tens of thousands of federally subsidized rental units in American cities.

The idea is to pay for the construction of low-rise rental apartment buildings and town houses, as well as the purchase of foreclosed homes that can be refurbished and rented to low- and moderate-income families at affordable rates.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; bhohud; housing; hud; lping; obama; ownershipsociety; rentals; section8; slumlords; slums
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: joinedafterattack
Does this man in the White House ever have an idea that is good for the responsable people in America? Let him be the first to live in one of these properties, and "share the wealth." Let him rent out his home in Chicago first, making it into several apts. Just like his heros did during communistic seizures of private proberty.

Was this what the housing crisis caused by the Dems was all about? Make it so the taxpaying home owners lost their homes...and take the homes over, rent them at low cost to the nontaxpaying public. Quite a plan, if you ask me.

41 posted on 08/16/2009 9:45:06 AM PDT by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
..not everybody should have a home because they’re not willing to keep it up....they run down the neighborhood.

you are on the wrong forum, the DU is the communist, left wing, let them eat cake forum.

42 posted on 08/16/2009 9:50:37 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

Some previously nice suburbs have some “ghetto” sections due to the Section 8 housing being located there.

Yep maybe “there goes the neighborhood”. There are empty and foreclosed homes in nice suburbs. So we’re going to “renovate” detached suburban homes into multi-family housing? Or rent these homes at below market rates to Section 8 people?

Since Section 8 and public housing are already major programs, do we really need another major government intervention to provide more housing for poor people?

Why is this even being discussed now. What happened to health care as the issue of the day?


43 posted on 08/16/2009 9:53:14 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat; bamahead; dcwusmc; djsherin; Bokababe; calcowgirl; Impy; sickoflibs
GTH out of the housing market, period. No more. It’s caused enough problems as it is.

Exactly.

Actually, I would get the government out of a lot more than just housing.

With practically everything that the Federal Government touches--ranging from college tuition to housing to transportation--the Federal Government is notorious for destroying the quality and quantity of goods and services delivered and dramatically increasing costs and thus prices, relative to the "normal" pull and push of market forces like supply and demand. Simply put, to paraphrase Reagan, the nine worst words in the English language are almost always "I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help."

44 posted on 08/16/2009 9:54:00 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (May God save the American Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Sounds like the Obamabots and Acorn squatters discovered property taxes.


45 posted on 08/16/2009 9:54:22 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Sheesh. It’s LBJ.


46 posted on 08/16/2009 9:55:22 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

It’s not only cats and dogs. Human beings have been known to urinate in these places too. The stench of the human waste is also strong in these places.


47 posted on 08/16/2009 9:55:58 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Please report back to us after the house next to yours is converted to Section 8 housing.


48 posted on 08/16/2009 9:56:26 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

Goal: Destroy white suburbs. Leave no place left for people to flee to.


49 posted on 08/16/2009 9:57:28 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

More communism


50 posted on 08/16/2009 9:57:30 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

in decades gone by, these were called simply the “projects”


51 posted on 08/16/2009 9:57:38 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
Also published by the Boston Globe. (boston.com is part of the BG)

Obama's "community organizing" left Chicago neighborhoods in ruins.

Grim proving ground for Obama's housing policy

"About 99 of the units are vacant, many rendered uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage. Mice scamper through the halls. Battered mailboxes hang open. Sewage backs up into kitchen sinks. In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale - a score so bad the buildings now face demolition."

That's what we need on a national scale! /s

52 posted on 08/16/2009 9:58:10 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just what this country needs, more drug infested slums.


53 posted on 08/16/2009 9:59:41 AM PDT by KarinG1 (You're just jealous because the voices don't talk to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
As recently as March/April you had the same old Leftwingtard operators out there demanding MORE FUNDS TO BUILD MORE SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

How utterly ridiculous.

I think what this news means is that somone figured out that we presently have a serious housing surplus, so building more houses will be wasteful.

Surprising to see commonsense taking hold in any part of the Obama regime, but stranger things have happened.

You all recall when Ronaldus Magnus' HUD people discovered that we could get "more bang for the buck" by renting existing housing for qualifying elderly or poor people than by building new public housing units?

You do recall that, right? This is Ronnie's own plan!

54 posted on 08/16/2009 9:59:52 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
How about getting the government out of approving subdividing property (beyond the initial survey when it was still government land) and providing for recordation of real estate in government records?

How far do you want to carry this ~ I'm game!

55 posted on 08/16/2009 10:01:27 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
this is better than encouraging ppl to buy house they couldn’t afford and going into debt to do it

You do realize that government built housing projects set the rules for tenants. One of the first is "no firearms." Do you really want millions more Americans living under the Marxist thumb of the FedGov? Indoctrinating more Americans to accept a nanny-state and the loss of liberties that goes with it?

56 posted on 08/16/2009 10:03:41 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
Was this what the housing crisis caused by the Dems was all about? Make it so the taxpaying home owners lost their homes...and take the homes over, rent them at low cost to the nontaxpaying public. Quite a plan, if you ask me.

That wouldn't surprise me in the least.

57 posted on 08/16/2009 10:04:41 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel
"... I knew THIS was coming..... there goes every neighborhood, everywhere.

Me too. I've been worried about this since the stimulus bill. This scares me far more than the 'Health Care Reform' issue.

There are communities all over the USA where there's all sorts of empty standing foreclosed property that's essentially owned by the Federal government.

They don't even need to build high rise housing projects of the 1970s, rather merely move Section 8 renters into these distressed properties. Overnight, suburbia will have one or two 'families' on each street that came straight out of the ghetto. Chain link fences, bars on the windows, pit bulls, subsonic bass car stereo systems, graffiti, and unemployed young men sitting on the porch drinking and waiting for you to go off to work while you drive away in the morning holding your stainless steel commuter cup full of coffee.

'Leave It To Beaver' meets 'Boyz N Tha Hood' with a stroke of Obama's pen. They'll probably move them in from hundreds or thousands of miles away under some Federal 'Fresh Views 2010' program designed to 'relieve urban crowding in disadvantaged communities'.

This is like having former NYC mayor David Dinkins for President.

58 posted on 08/16/2009 10:09:18 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Obama Advisor Valerie Jarrett Linked to Real Estate Scandals
59 posted on 08/16/2009 10:12:32 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: angkor

The government wants a proletariat, and home ownership threatens that. For a combination of philosophical, environmental, and population-control reasons, liberals now want to suppress the building of single-family homes in favor of high-density apartments and town-houses. They will make it difficult or impossible to develop land that’s already developed. They want us to be a nation of rootless, childless or one-child renters, utterly dependent upon the government for every need. Europe is their model. Last year, Paul Krugman was pushing this idea, I’ve seen it touted in Harpers and the Atlantic Monthly, and for mer King County Executive Ron Sims - now an official in the Obama admin - said as much in a lecture last year. In the Seattle area, everywhere you look, they’re tearing down houses and replacing them with high-density.


60 posted on 08/16/2009 10:16:22 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson