Posted on 08/17/2009 8:49:29 AM PDT by La Lydia
The headlines are encouraging: The AP reports, “White House appears ready to drop ‘public option’.” Politico reads, “White House backs away from public health care option.” And the front page of USA Today says, “Obama may drop public option in health care.” These headers all stem from Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ comment on CNN Sunday Morning that the public option “is not the essential element” of President Barack Obama’s health care plan. But by Sunday night the White House was already walking back Sebelius’ statement.
An anonymous administration official told The Atlantic that Sebelius “misspoke” and White House health reform communications director Linda Douglass released a statement explaining: “Nothing has changed. The president has always said that what is essential is that health-insurance reform must lower costs, ensure that there are affordable options for all Americans and it must increase choice and competition in the health-insurance market. He believes the public option is the best way to achieve those goals.”
Obama’s allies on the left are equally emphatic about the non-death of the public option. Democracy for America head Howard Dean told the Washington Post, “I don’t think this bill is worth passing without a public option.” And Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told CNN, “It would be very, very difficult [to pass Obama's plan] without the public option.” But Democrats in the Senate are singing a slightly different story. Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) told Fox News Sunday that “there never have been” enough votes for a public option in the Senate, and that continuing to fight for it would be “just a wasted effort.”
But that does not mean that Americans fighting against government-run health care are out of the woods yet. Conrad insists that the Senate could pass health reform that includes health insurance co-operatives. Co-operatives do have a long and proud tradition in many sectors of the U.S. economy, but details matter. Conrad says these health co-ops will not be “government-run and government-controlled” but instead “membership-run and membership controlled.”
But others in Conrad’s caucus have a starkly different co-op goal. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is pushing a vision of co-ops that are: 1) run by the government, preferably the federal government; 2) funded or subsidized by the government; or 3) includes plans chosen by the government.
If the language that comes out of the Senate looks anything like what Schumer is proposing, then there is no real difference between co-ops and the public plan. If, on the other hand, the Senate produces something that; 1) is not funded by the federal government 2) is not “government-run and government-controlled”; but instead 3) is “membership-run and membership controlled” then co-ops would be acceptable. Of course, the public plan is just one of the more objectionable parts of Obama’s health care plan. The individual and employer mandates, the expansion and federalization of Medicaid, the creation of a new health czar, not to mention the trillion dollar cost of the new plan, are all still intact. If, as Sebelius insists, the White House wants health reform to increase “choice and competition” than there are a number of conservative alternatives in the House and Senate that do just that by pursuing health reform through a “patient-centered” approach.
The White House’s rhetoric is rapidly moving away from an expert/government-centered approach to health care and towards a more market/consumer model. Let’s hope their actions start matching their words....
Vampires are hard to kill.
I’m reminded of Hitler’s last great offensive in WWII; the “Battle of the Buldge”. The Dems are regrouping for one final push after a brief lull in late August.
I think they will try to call it something else, to get it through, but I don’t think they will pull the wool over many eyes that way. But yes they are trying for one final push. The trick will be for us to push back harder. And the Battle of the Bulge didn’t quite work out the way Hitler had planned.
” I think they will try to call it something else, to get it through, but I don’t think they will pull the wool over many eyes that way. “
I can think of a few dopes like Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Grassley, Graham, Lugar,
Voinovich, Murkowski,Martinez and Enzi
for starters,
who will be happy to help Barry spin the wool that
he will later pull over their eyes.
There are many pitfalls to be overcome. You may read the bill before it is voted on by the House and by the Senate. But you won’t get to read the final bill until the conference report is agreed to and released so both houses can vote on final passage. If they receive the conference report with ONLY GOD KNOWS what’s in it, and vote on final passage the next day, which has been known to happen, we won’t know what the actual law is until after the fact. The conference offers many, many opportunities for mischief. It is not impossible, however unlikely, for the bill to be rewritten to encompass a single-payer system, on which there would then be an up or down vote in both houses.
The Senate Co-op plan is a Trojan Horse. When the bill gets to the House/Senate resolution committee, the public option will magically reappear.
That is what my post indicated. There is opportunity for lots of mischief in the conference committee proceedings, if that is what you are referring to. I don’t know what a resolution committee is, and am unfamiliar with that term. As I said, they can do anything in the conference committee, including going beyond the public option and incorporating a single-payer system into the bill. And, of course, they would still have to get final passage in both house on the conference version, which would be iffy if they have completely rewritten the bill.
.
_____________________________________
PING! PING! PING!
NEWSFLASH! GOVERNOR RICK PERRY IS SCHEDULED TO BE ON PLAINS RADIO TONIGHT MONDAY, AUGUST 17, DURING THE PROGRAM FROM 7-8 PM CST TO DISCUSS OBAMA DEATHCARE AND INVOKING THE 10TH AMENDMENT OVER IT.
HE WILL CALL IN DURING THE PROGRAM.
PLAINS RADIO:
http://www.plainsradio.com/radio.html
_____________________________________
.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.