Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

” Now, here we have a President who swore an oath that he was qualified to be president, and yet he refuses to allow the American People to verify the veracity of that claim – and his refusal has cost him a million dollars.

Is this a case of perjury? President Clinton was impeached for perjury.

The media used to howl about the “public’s right to know” yet remain silent here.

Many good conservatives are telling the disclosurists to shut up, to stifle themselves (you gotta love Archie Bunker) in a manner almost identical to the Obama Administration, which is demanding silence from critics. Now, I’m not impugning their motives, but I am saying they are wrong to attempt this; it suggests an embarrassment, a sense that, yes, we are a bunch of kooks who are trying to keep quiet lest the general public get wise. But this is about more than just politics (though it is a solid political weapon); this is about the rule of law.

We heard much about the rule of law during the Clinton impeachment. The whole reason the House went forward was to uphold the rule of law. The Constitution lays out the qualifications for office holders, and Congress codifies those qualifications. One qualification is that a person must be either born here, or be born to citizens. In the case of Obama the law at that time specified that a woman could not pass on her citizenship if the father was a non-citizen and the child was born overseas, if she had not reached the age of majority. Under U.S. law at that time Barack Obama would not be a citizen, since his mother was only 18 IF he was born in Kenya – something his maternal grandmother has claimed. Oh, and Obama was a dual citizen of both Kenya and the U.S., a point he neglected to tell the American voters.”


In my view, the obamanation is clearly guilty of lying about his records. People do not spend over a million dollars to keep records hidden unless those records reveal lies. In this case, in my view, obamanation is CLEARLY guilty of not ONLY TREASON but REVERSE-TREASON. i.e., he got into office through lies of basic eligibility and once in office, he immediately and actively launched an attack on the American people within the bounds of the United States, not seen in the History of America. That is Reverse-Treason. This obamanation is clearly, just that. A kenyan obamanation inflicted on America to destroy.


7 posted on 08/18/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT by bareford101 (Be loud! We have nothing – NOTHING - to apologize for in fighting for our Country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bareford101
The entire dem- rat party is a collection of people guilty of treason.

and they know it

34 posted on 08/18/2009 3:12:16 PM PDT by reefdiver (So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson