Posted on 08/20/2009 4:10:50 AM PDT by libertarian27
I could give you a bit of the interview Cavuto did … but why bother? Neil’s commentary at the end of the show is far more entertaining and far more revealing about Barney Frank … rude and disrespectful to his constituents. Come to think of it … it’s really become the Democrat mantra hasn’t it? And why not? In the Bay State he has set up the strangest geographical district ever created to assure a safe seat. (From Opencongress.org) ~ Says Cavuto, “I thought I stunk …. as it turns out, everyone stinks.” Enjoy!
(Excerpt) Read more at radioviceonline.com ...
Hit out of the park by Rush yesterday (apparently. I didn’t hear it, but my brother called me still laughing about it.)
But those people aren't trying to rule our lives.
We NEED to hear what Reid, Pelosi, Frank and the other dems are saying. At least Rush speeds up their voices and makes them sound like chipmunks :)
The purpose of Congress was to represent their respective states chiefly in order to keep the 'central government' in check. This hasn't worked well at all.
Since Congress and the current resident(s) of the White House have proven that our Constitution is in mothballs perhaps it's time to get rid of them all and go to a benevolent dictator government for a decade or so.
America now resembles 1936 Spain, but I don't see a Franco emerging.
As far as BO is concerned, I must say that this was genius on Rush's part.
The power in BO is not WHAT he says, but how he says it. Speeding up the tempo not only destroys his cadence, but forces you to pay attention to what he's saying.
Bad for BO on two counts.
BINGO! Zero's words are pure BS, but the hypnotic power comes from der Fuhrer's cadenced delivery. Rush's "speed up" of Obama's recordings takes the power away, and exposes Zero as the slick BS artist that he truly is.
Beautifully written.
Oh, I quite agree! But not on every program, every day, sometimes two or three times a program. But this is just my humble opinion, and I know they are very good at what they do, the talk show hosts, so I defer to their skills and experience.
ITEM If Obama colluded with Pelosi, Reid, Frank so as to flim-flam constituents, that could be actionable. This should be reported to the FBI.
WORKING THESIS It appears Pelosi, Reid, Frank may be colluding with Obama to deceive constituents. The FBI should interrogate Pelosi, Reid, Frank to determine if Pelosi, Reid, Frank received anything of value from Obama to pull off the deception---money, jobs, political cover, to promulgate facilitate, and whether they colluded to misuse Congessional influence.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
POSSIBLE CHARGES Official acts prohibited, misuse of Congressional funds, abuse of public office, violating oath of office, misuse of government position, abuse of government power; conflict of interest; influence buying; conspiracy to deceive; misuse of elective office, collusion, conspiracy to collude.
Pelosi, Reid, Frank's official campaign finance records filed with the FEC, and state election commission, should be scrutinized for possible violations. Determine if names of Pelosi, Reid, Frank's contributors are legit and whether Pelosi, Reid, Frank illegally used campaign funds, and whether Pelosi, Reid, Frank received contributions connected to Obama donors to influence Conrgessional votes.
Pelosi, Reid, Frank and Obama may have colluded with to get or give something of value, a govt gratuity, a job, etc, in exchange for Promulgating ObamaCare.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
==========================================
FOR YOUR REFERENCE Did Pelosi, Reid, Frank deliberately raise more money than they needed, then divert some of the excess in a series of generous donations to non-profit groups that, on the surface, benefited their mutual causes? Pelosi, Reid, Frank’s donations to non-profits might then be illegally converted, then funneled back to Pelosi, Reid, Frank‘s campaign coffers through donations by N/P officers and their co-conspirators, or subsets of them. This is known as money laundering and tax evasion.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
These complicated transactions should draw scrutiny in legal and political circles to determine the extent to which state laws and campaign finance laws were violated in schemes that appear to launder donations to a candidate.
Campaign donations by publicly-held companies might also raise questions that should be investigated re shareholders in publicly-funded corporations who may have been deceived, and whether the true destination of corporate money was concealed. The SEC is interested in this. Email enforcement @SEC.gov
Pelosi, Reid, Frank may also have used non-profit, ethnic, hyphenated, or faith-based groups as middlemen for campaign transactions by a pattern of Pelosi, Reid, Frank funneling money from government-run organizations to these different groups, that was laundered, then landed back in Pelosi, Reid, Frank's campaign accounts, in order to obscure, if not cover-up, the original source of donations to campaign coffers.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
Pelosi, Reid, Frank, and their supporters might also have directed that campaign donations be made in the names of others without their knowledge or consent (known as "bundling"). When the financial merry-go-round stopped, non-profit, ethnic, hyphenated, and faith-based individuals---the groups Pelosi, Reid, Frank need for their election efforts---end up with a lot of money, some of which was then laundered, illegally converted, then funneled back into Pelosi, Reid, Frank’s campaign coffers.
Millions of dollars in donations to Pelosi, Reid, Frank might never have been disclosed to campaign regulators, because the type of government groups Pelosi, Reid, Frank used weren’t governed by federal law. Public-spirited donors might not always have known where their tax-deductible money was headed, and don't control funds once they're donated. Money gets transferred all the time and remains disclosed only to the extent required to be disclosed by applicable state and federal law.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
In another variation, Pelosi, Reid, Frank may have conspired to raise more money than was needed and then routed some of that money to other causes.......such as supporting state candidates. As a result, Pelosi, Reid, Frank might be beneficiaries, as a collateral effect, due to influence-peddling.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
There might be a pattern of disguising the original source of money in an effort to hide Pelosi, Reid, Frank’s simultaneous financial and legislative dealings with campaign contributors and/or Pelosi, Reid, Frank, and their business connections. Clandestine meetings may have been held in order to gain access and push the clients' interests, and to hide the genesis of campaign funding.
FBI TIP PAGE http://tips.fbi.gov/ (you may remain anonymous)
I may have to give Frank the top spot on my list of Jews Who Embarrass Me.
Definitely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.