To: SonOfDarkSkies
Uh, 20 seats is a little low for an average mid-term, not when the people are in a frenzy and will crawl over broken glass to get to the polls. If trends continue, losses will be closer to 40-50+.
To: cotton1706
I am hoping we see a Clinton style blowout- Newt Where are you???
6 posted on
08/20/2009 2:20:59 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
To: cotton1706
It’s an off-year. Many fewer Democrats are up for election.
10 posted on
08/20/2009 2:22:47 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: cotton1706
If trends continue, losses will be closer to 40-50+.
Yep. If Dems in the Senate try to ram this Health Bill through with reconcillation (the 50 vote option) and scorch the constitution in the process it will hurt the House even more.
This is assuming these Marxists even allow mid-term elections to proceed in 2010. I'm already predicting they'll have some 'crisis' to try and get in the way...at that point, we'll be down to our last option.
73 posted on
08/20/2009 4:04:09 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
To: cotton1706
"If trends continue, losses will be closer to 40-50+".
I've been predicting 50 seats for a month...based on macro trends.
89 posted on
08/20/2009 4:50:13 PM PDT by
Mariner
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson