Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
The Constitution no longer means what it says.

It won't if the incorporationists have their way.

"Had the framers of these amendments intended them to be limitations on the powers of the State governments, they would have imitated the framers of the original Constitution, and have expressed that intention. Had Congress engaged in the extraordinary occupation of improving the Constitutions of the several States by affording the people additional protection from the exercise of power by their own governments in matters which concerned themselves alone, they would have declared this purpose in plain and intelligible language."--Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833)

16 posted on 08/24/2009 8:40:05 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave
You do know that Barron v. Baltimore came down 35 years before the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted.
17 posted on 08/24/2009 8:53:58 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Mojave
It won't if the incorporationists have their way.

They already did. It's called the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS has just been reluctant to declare its meaning binding until each enumerated right is reviewed individually.

30 posted on 08/24/2009 10:22:23 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson