Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Randy Larsen

I’ve been a lurker since about 03 or 04, but stayed away from posting. At the time, neoconservatism was the party line and needless to say FR was a hostile place for paleos. I fail to understand how being concerned with CIA tactics in 2002 excuses Clinton’s actions with the Chinese in the late 90s, or ECHELON, Waco, Kosovo, ect. It seems pretty obvious to me that most of Bush’s policy mistakes can be traced back to those of Clinton (many of which were worse but of course never talked about by the MSM).


35 posted on 08/25/2009 9:46:49 PM PDT by RAO1125 (Neoconservatism:Failed. Socialism:Failing (again). Next up: Libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: RAO1125

Just because you lurked doesn’t give you any credibility whatsoever!

Liberals Lurk here all the time, then jump in when they feel the time is right, causing massive harm.

If you believe neoconservatism was the party line, you found the wrong website to post your bullshit on! We believe in the CONSTITUTION as written, not some political slang written about in the MSM!


37 posted on 08/25/2009 9:55:21 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson